Absolute Poker's Official Response to "superuser" allegations

[OOPSYDOOPSYBRO]

[ QUOTE ]
Dear Absolute Support,

Go to hell.

[/ QUOTE ]

[repulse]

Anything less than a comprehensive statistical analysis, complete with methodology and numerical likelihood results, is insufficient IMHO. Absolute has had enough time to perform this.

The bottom line here is that it is an extreme statistical improbability that the players in question could NOT see their opponents cards given how they acted. An informal report based on a nonscientific analysis really carries no merit for something like this.

[jafeather]

OMG please let OP be a gimmick account. If that's the best job AP can do in explaining this mess then they have ABSOLUTEly made things worse. Their reply neither makes sense, nor holds water.

If OP is a gimmick...good job.

[WhoIam]

Am I the only one who thinks there's a good chance this isn't actually from AP, especially since it contradicts what TeddyFBI was told by them?

[MicroBob]

i think that teddy being told something different by a different person in their organization carries absolutely zero weight in determining whether the original post is legit or not.

[Leader]

ip is Costa Rican. email is at from absolutepoker.com FWIW

[xxeximusxx]

It's amazing how easily AP is getting away with this, their is really nothing we can do. They are not gonna lose a significant ammount of traffic as most players do not know or do not really care.

[DMoogle]

I have a feeling the only calling on the river he's referring to is when the superuser accounts are calling an all-in bet with the best hand.

I've never played at Absolute Poker, and after all that I've heard of them, I never will.

[sethypooh21]

Move along people, nothing to see here...

[KEW]

I feel insulted just reading this...

AP even has the nerve to "hide" behind there privacy clause even adds emphasis with the "ever"...

Wonder how they proved "chip dumping" if the "other" actions were legit?????

I for one will never play at AP or UB again....