|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Take it? | |||
| yes |
   
|
6 | 66.67% |
| no |
  
|
3 | 33.33% |
| Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#62
10-08-2007, 02:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Starship Troopers Vs. King Kong (2005)
I 'got' Starship Troopers, but the acting was just SO [censored] BAD that it is distracting. Kudos for naked Dina Meyer, however. And it is fun to watch MST3K style.
KK was just long and dull. And Naomi Watts had too many clothes on. 
|
|
#64
10-09-2007, 09:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Starship Troopers Vs. King Kong (2005)
This movie (Starship Troopers) has:
1) Dina Meyer's hot naked ass 2) Michael Ironside being a badass 3) One (1) Busey, which is a sign of cinematic entertainment 4) Clancy Brown being a badass 5) Cheap Dina Meyer booby shots 6) Patrick Muldoon in a major role 7) Doogie Howser playing an S.S. soldier 8) Pretty rad special f/x 9) Casper Van Dien's chin 10) Did I mention Dina Meyer gets naked in it?
|
|
#66
10-09-2007, 10:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Starship Troopers Vs. King Kong (2005)
Starship Troopers had gratuitous nudity, extreme violence, and Doogie Howser MD. Ooooh...and Michael Ironside, too! How the hell could someone not love this movie?
Edit: And now that I've read to the end of the thread, I realize that Samjjones already covered this...and more.
|
|
#67
10-09-2007, 10:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Starship Troopers Vs. King Kong (2005)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] It would be interesting to see how many people who don't think Starship Troopers was the biggest pile of [censored] every put down on film actually read the book first. [/ QUOTE ] You ever talk about a movie with someone who read the book? They're always so condescending, "Ah, the book was much better than the movie." "Oh really? What I enjoyed about the movie? No reading. It only took two hours, and then I could take a nap." [/ QUOTE ] It's nice to see someone stand up for the idiots of the world who find reading difficult. [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
