Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 09-28-2007, 08:18 AM
Mike Gallo Mike Gallo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,422
Default Re: Rank the Mets\' collapse

I find this the worst collapse I have ever seen.
It doesnt get much worse than this.

2 weeks ago we had a seven gane cusion, now we have a tie with three to go.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 09-28-2007, 08:53 AM
Wynton Wynton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: coping with the apokerlypse
Posts: 5,123
Default Re: Rank the Mets\' collapse

As I said before, it's not just the number of games lost, but the manner in which they've been lost that distinguishes this collapse.

One of these days, when I'm feeling especially masochistic, I'm going to detail each loss, which I expect to make vivid how many were blown, huge leads.

I have two, tiny rays of positive thoughts:

(1) It would be pretty funny if the Phillies don't get into the playoffs, after all this.

(2) If the Mets don't recover, perhaps that will motivate management to make more dramatic changes than he would have otherwise, and perhaps the team will come back with a real hunger, which was totally lacking this entire season.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 09-28-2007, 09:21 AM
samjjones samjjones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,415
Default Re: Rank the Mets\' collapse

TOO SOON
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 09-28-2007, 09:40 AM
HorridSludgyBits HorridSludgyBits is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 108
Default Re: Rank the Mets\' collapse

This is sort of OT, but does anyone else remember which year it was that the Dodgers gained 11 games in 11 days against the Braves? I'm thinking it was 1983, and some of those might have been before 9/12, but that was a pretty remarkable run. There were a number of head-to-head games, and nearly every one seemed to be decided on the last at-bat.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 09-28-2007, 10:00 AM
HorridSludgyBits HorridSludgyBits is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 108
Default Re: Rank the Mets\' collapse

Ok, it happened mainly in August, still an epic collapse:

August 10, 1983: The Atlanta Braves hold a 6 1/2-game lead over the Dodgers in the National League West. At 69-45, they had the best record in baseball, and at .589, the best third-order winning percentage. The simulator made them the winner 96.6% of the time. They couldn't hold the lead until the end of the month, much less the end of the season, going 7-12 over the remainder of August while the Dodgers went a resounding 16-5. The Dodgers took the odds lead on Sept. 2, gave it back for a day on the sixth, but thereafter ran away from the Braves, who went 12-17 in September.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 09-28-2007, 10:13 AM
NajdorfDefense NajdorfDefense is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 8,227
Default Re: Rank the Mets\' collapse

[ QUOTE ]
As I said before, it's not just the number of games lost, but the manner in which they've been lost that distinguishes this collapse.

I have two, tiny rays of positive thoughts:

(1) It would be pretty funny and completely standard if the Phillies don't get into the playoffs, after all this.


[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 09-28-2007, 10:16 AM
Nick B. Nick B. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: AIM Nickb2p2
Posts: 4,001
Default Re: Rank the Mets\' collapse

[ QUOTE ]
August 10, 1983: The Atlanta Braves hold a 6 1/2-game lead over the Dodgers in the National League West.

[/ QUOTE ]


that is so funny.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 09-28-2007, 10:18 AM
JordanIB JordanIB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,167
Default Re: Rank the Mets\' collapse

[ QUOTE ]
As I said before, it's not just the number of games lost, but the manner in which they've been lost that distinguishes this collapse.

One of these days, when I'm feeling especially masochistic, I'm going to detail each loss, which I expect to make vivid how many were blown, huge leads.

I have two, tiny rays of positive thoughts:

(1) It would be pretty funny if the Phillies don't get into the playoffs, after all this.

(2) If the Mets don't recover, perhaps that will motivate management to make more dramatic changes than he would have otherwise, and perhaps the team will come back with a real hunger, which was totally lacking this entire season.

[/ QUOTE ]

I hope a failure to make the playoffs doesn't cause a gross overraction to the state of the team and franchise. It's not as if we're a team in crisis with no good parts.

Will go into detail after I come out of my deep depression after Sunday...
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 09-28-2007, 10:23 AM
Mike Gallo Mike Gallo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,422
Default Re: Rank the Mets\' collapse

[ QUOTE ]
TOO SOON

[/ QUOTE ]


It already happened.

This team has no chutzbah no moxxy no grit no determination.
They have played like dogs.

They could not get a race runner passed second base last night for goodness sake.

Put a fork in them, they have collapsed. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 09-28-2007, 10:25 AM
wh1t3bread wh1t3bread is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Initech
Posts: 2,408
Default Re: Rank the Mets\' collapse

[ QUOTE ]
I hope a failure to make the playoffs doesn't cause a gross overraction to the state of the team and franchise. It's not as if we're a team in crisis with no good parts.


[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. Most of the parts are there. But a few are clearly broken and we seem to be missing a few screws.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.