Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 09-01-2007, 06:34 PM
Peter666 Peter666 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Your own, personal, Antichrist
Posts: 3,323
Default Re: Latest gay marriage flareup

[ QUOTE ]
Wow, a lot to answer.

Firstly, no one ever called gays "perversions". I was talking about the act - and that society shouldn't recognize it or put it on par with male-female marriage - and shouldn't have to if they don't want to. This is the whole crux of the reason why gay marriage isn't recognized. If you want to bury these types of comments, then how can we have a candid discussion?

Equal protection - only applies if marriage is taken to mean a union between any two people, and not its original meaning of a man and a woman. Marriage is a special institution that recognizes one man and one woman - homosexual couples are free to contract in any other way they see fit. I don't see this as being different to the law that requires the president to be US born or that allows race-based affirmative action.

[ QUOTE ]
And if what you say is true, then why do you think you have a right to stop them using violence or the threat of it?

[/ QUOTE ]
I thought I did answer this. Nothing is being stopped with violence. Society has a choice whether or not it wants to accept gay marriage as legitimate, if gays want to get married under the religion of their choice, they can do so according to the whims of that religion.

Difference between racial intermarriage: Well, that's clear discrimination based on race. As I said, if the act is defined as one between a man and woman (which I think it is), then gay marriages can't be marriages. I think it's a stretch to suggest that anyone ever intended marriage to mean "between a white man and white woman".

edit: iron just PMed me and said the perversion comment is bigoted and not allowed here. Fair enough. I will stay out of these threads in future, so enjoy your one sided viewpoint and "vigorous debate".

[/ QUOTE ]

Hooray for the thought police! I can sleep soundly tonight knowing that Phil's perverted views on perversions will not have the chance to pervert me.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 09-02-2007, 05:12 AM
doucy doucy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: LOLOLOLOLOLO Posts: 3827946
Posts: 421
Default Re: Latest gay marriage flareup

[ QUOTE ]
Is there any coherent argument against gay marriage that isn't based on some sort of moral or religious belief?

[/ QUOTE ]

Passing a law allowing gay marriage forces everyone to recognize gay marriage, even though many people don't believe in it.

Just another reason why the government should be taken out of marriage altogether.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.