|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What do you do with K9o? | |||
| Raise |
   
|
2 | 2.44% |
| Limp |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Fold |
  
|
74 | 90.24% |
| Show me potato salad! |
  
|
6 | 7.32% |
| Voters: 82. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#61
06-26-2007, 05:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ESPN Poll : Bonds, Griffey, or A-Rod in their prime?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Fact is none of these guys has been successful in the playoffs, [/ QUOTE ] In what world is .471/.700/1.294 (Bonds in the 2002 World Series) not successful? [/ QUOTE ] So Bonds in prime steroid form was playoff worthy, but Bonds without roids was what, worst playoff performer ever? Exactly why then should I choose him to win? 
|
|
#62
06-26-2007, 06:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN Poll : Bonds, Griffey, or A-Rod in their prime?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] from reading many of the comments here, I wouldve thought that Bonds had 4 or 5 rings. I wonder why that's not the case? Fact is none of these guys has been successful in the playoffs, but one of them was at least exciting - think Seattle vs Yankees, and then remember the spirit and competitiveness that Griffey brought to the table. As a matter of fact, I think that series alone make him the choice for me, but he had other great qualities in his prime too: his beautiful swing, his have fun at all times early years, and his defensive acrobatics to name a few. [/ QUOTE ]  ? [/ QUOTE ] Nope, he's an idiot.
|
|
#63
06-26-2007, 06:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN Poll : Bonds, Griffey, or A-Rod in their prime?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Fact is none of these guys has been successful in the playoffs, [/ QUOTE ] In what world is .471/.700/1.294 (Bonds in the 2002 World Series) not successful? [/ QUOTE ] So Bonds in prime steroid form was playoff worthy, but Bonds without roids was what, worst playoff performer ever? Exactly why then should I choose him to win? [/ QUOTE ] You are a moron of the highest order.
|
|
#64
06-26-2007, 06:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN Poll : Bonds, Griffey, or A-Rod in their prime?
[ QUOTE ]
This shouldn't be close. For the people not voting for Bonds, do you even [censored] know who Barry Bonds is? [/ QUOTE ] I know enough to not want him on my team. Why are the numbers the only important aspect for you kyleb?
|
|
#65
06-26-2007, 06:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN Poll : Bonds, Griffey, or A-Rod in their prime?
.308/.342/.646
vs. .328/.515/.863 Umm.... yeah. look at that.
|
|
#66
06-26-2007, 06:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN Poll : Bonds, Griffey, or A-Rod in their prime?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This shouldn't be close. For the people not voting for Bonds, do you even [censored] know who Barry Bonds is? [/ QUOTE ] I know enough to not want him on my team. Why are the numbers the only important aspect for you kyleb? [/ QUOTE ] Didn't the Giants make the WS the year that clubhouse dramaments were at it's peak?
|
|
#67
06-26-2007, 06:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN Poll : Bonds, Griffey, or A-Rod in their prime?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Fact is none of these guys has been successful in the playoffs, [/ QUOTE ] In what world is .471/.700/1.294 (Bonds in the 2002 World Series) not successful? [/ QUOTE ] So Bonds in prime steroid form was playoff worthy, but Bonds without roids was what, worst playoff performer ever? Exactly why then should I choose him to win? [/ QUOTE ] You are a moron of the highest order. [/ QUOTE ] really? Year Round Tm Opp WLser G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG SB CS SH SF HBP +------------------+-----+---+---+---+---+--+--+--+---+---+---+-----+-----+-----+--+--+--+--+--+ 1990 NLCS PIT CIN L 6 18 4 3 0 0 0 1 6 5 .167 .375 .167 2 0 0 0 0 1991 NLCS PIT ATL L 7 27 1 4 1 0 0 0 2 4 .148 .207 .185 3 0 0 0 0 1992 NLCS PIT ATL L 7 23 5 6 1 0 1 2 6 4 .261 .433 .435 1 0 0 0 1 1997 NLDS SFG FLA L 3 12 0 3 2 0 0 2 0 3 .250 .231 .417 1 0 0 1 0 2000 NLDS SFG NYM L 4 17 2 3 1 1 0 1 3 4 .176 .300 .353 1 0 0 0 0 really? isn't he basically the anti reggie jackson?
|
|
#68
06-26-2007, 07:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN Poll : Bonds, Griffey, or A-Rod in their prime?
[ QUOTE ]
.308/.342/.646 vs. .328/.515/.863 Umm.... yeah. look at that. [/ QUOTE ] what are you comparing even? and did I not mention that fantasy wise there's no way I choose griffey over bonds? numbers aren't the most important ingredient here.
|
|
#69
06-26-2007, 07:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN Poll : Bonds, Griffey, or A-Rod in their prime?
Were you around in 2001? Did you realize that Barry Bonds got intentionally walked with the bases empty?
Full post season stats: 9 Postseason Ser 2-7 48 151 33 37 8 2 9 24 52 26 .245 .433 .503 9 1 0 4 1 But sample size, yadda yadda, only one year of prime barry bonds, etc.
|
|
#70
06-26-2007, 07:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN Poll : Bonds, Griffey, or A-Rod in their prime?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] .308/.342/.646 vs. .328/.515/.863 Umm.... yeah. look at that. [/ QUOTE ] what are you comparing even? and did I not mention that fantasy wise there's no way I choose griffey over bonds? numbers aren't the most important ingredient here. [/ QUOTE ] But like taking Griffey is giving up about 60 runs a year (straight from RC difference).
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
