***Official FTP Regs Thread***

[V4P]

Thoughts on "pokerperro"?

He's a pretty big winner in my 3/6--5/10 DB, while playing a 52/26 type game. Not particularly aggressive, but always seems to "get there" by the river.

[QuietEarner]

alot of 2/4 3/6 players here. I'll bring it down to the 1/2 level. Anything on Beaten_Battered, I play mostly 1/2 and have taken a few shots at 2/4 but always seem to run bad when I do (but prob just a donk).

[counterspell]

i have pokerperro as a significant loser at 5/10 over 5k, but he's up in my DB because he ran good at 8/16.

thoughts on archicruz (me)?

[thepizzlefosho]

pokerperro is a meh LAG. He has lots of leaks, and if you get him to your right he is definitely +EV at the table. He is decent enough though that he is a pain to have on your left.

[QuietEarner]

Any good info on any 1/2 players.

[bobhalford]

I don't know, but all the players mentioned in this thread are not very good. Studholdem is aiight, but the rest are average players, even if they are winners. And fwiw, I absolutely destroy/kill/dominate the 2/4 - 5/10 games on FTP.

[V4P]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't know, but all the players mentioned in this thread are not very good. Studholdem is aiight, but the rest are average players, even if they are winners. And fwiw, I absolutely destroy/kill/dominate the 2/4 - 5/10 games on FTP.

[/ QUOTE ]

Who are you?

Who are the best players at those limits?

[bobhalford]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know, but all the players mentioned in this thread are not very good. Studholdem is aiight, but the rest are average players, even if they are winners. And fwiw, I absolutely destroy/kill/dominate the 2/4 - 5/10 games on FTP.

[/ QUOTE ]

Who are you?

Who are the best players at those limits?

[/ QUOTE ]

Nope, ain't tellin'. That's cuz I post advice on this forum and I don't want anyone reading to know how I think. Since we all play together, it's best to keep screen names a secret.

As for the best players, I try to avoid them. Can't think of anyone that I think is that good though, seriously. It's probably because the good players and I don't tangle too much. I just don't notice them that often.

Oh yeah, pokerperro is a bad player, at least if I remember correctly. And bobobobo117 sits down at 5/10 with like 10BB's. Kinda weird/fishy huh?

[counterspell]

[ QUOTE ]
I absolutely destroy/kill/dominate the 2/4 - 5/10 games on FTP.

[/ QUOTE ]

bob, do you mind if i ask what your winrate is?

[bobhalford]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I absolutely destroy/kill/dominate the 2/4 - 5/10 games on FTP.

[/ QUOTE ]

bob, do you mind if i ask what your winrate is?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't mind you asking, but to be honest, I don't know. That's because I no longer use Poker Tracker. Some might think this is stupid, and maybe it is. But I found that relying on stats for reads wasn't doing me much good.

I don't know why it is, but ever since giving up PT (around this time last year), I've never done better at poker. It might be cuz of PT, could be cause I'm a stronger player. Maybe the players are weaker, who knows. But with rakeback, I'm doing very well.