Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 05-25-2007, 02:36 PM
dlk9s dlk9s is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: It\'s not gonna happen.
Posts: 3,410
Default Re: Foxwoods World Poker Finals thread

[ QUOTE ]
Kathy Liebert is fugly.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's some original commentary.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 05-25-2007, 02:42 PM
Wetdog Wetdog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Downswing? No, playing bad. No, I\'m sure its just a downswing.
Posts: 1,894
Default Re: Foxwoods World Poker Finals thread

It'll be rerun tomorrow @ noon ET.

One of the things I noticed was when anyone raised preflop EG was pushing all in. I think allowing him to limp was the best way to handle him.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 05-25-2007, 02:59 PM
chigua713 chigua713 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 39
Default Re: Foxwoods World Poker Finals thread

During EG's interview, he said he's seen a lot of miracles in his lifetime. His voice was shivering. Anybody ask him what the miracles were?
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 05-25-2007, 03:24 PM
27offsuit 27offsuit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MAsshole
Posts: 2,821
Default Re: Foxwoods World Poker Finals thread

[ QUOTE ]
During EG's interview, he said he's seen a lot of miracles in his lifetime. His voice was shivering. Anybody ask him what the miracles were?

[/ QUOTE ]


Jesus!...

Jesus.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 05-25-2007, 06:14 PM
ciki57 ciki57 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: lol documents
Posts: 580
Default Re: Foxwoods World Poker Finals thread

Wow, the two hands where EG stacked off with A high were pure gold.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 05-25-2007, 07:19 PM
Kimbell175113 Kimbell175113 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The art of losing isn\'t hard to master.
Posts: 2,464
Default Re: Foxwoods World Poker Finals thread

Nenad played g00t this final table.

When talking about past champions of this event, they go back three years then stop. They even show four names on the screen, but don't mention Howard. Is this because of the lawsuit, or am I just imagining things?
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 05-25-2007, 09:02 PM
7n7 7n7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,369
Default Re: Foxwoods World Poker Finals thread

[ QUOTE ]
Nenad played g00t this final table.

When talking about past champions of this event, they go back three years then stop. They even show four names on the screen, but don't mention Howard. Is this because of the lawsuit, or am I just imagining things?

[/ QUOTE ]

Later on they show the complete list and Lederer is on it, although you're right, they didn't verbally mention him. Good catch.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 05-26-2007, 01:41 PM
Slim Pickens Slim Pickens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: John Wayne\'s not dead.
Posts: 5,574
Default Re: Foxwoods World Poker Finals thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
That Doyle Brunson hand is truly unbelievable. Limped flop was TT2 with two diamonds. Nenad (flopping 1000 to 1) with T2o bets 100K into 140K flop. EG (A8o) raises 200K more. Nenad reraises to 1.1M and has only 1.6M more behind. EG then 4-bets Nenad all-in with no pair and no draw! Nenad has at worst a weak ten or a flush draw and is pot committed either way.

MY GOD!

[/ QUOTE ]

The bluff there wasn't terrible in a vacuum, although obviously in context it is much worse. Don't forget Mimi was really short-stacked at the time and Nenad and EG were both much deeper. It's an absolute disaster for Nenad to bust there. I really doubt Nenad three-bets without AT or T2, rather looks at a turn that's hopefully not a diamond, but EG doesn't know that and would never think about that. Nenad understood the thing Mimi didn't, which was "never bluff a calling station."

[/ QUOTE ]

I was confused as to why Nenad re-raised, since he was sitting on the nuts. A player with any sense would shut down completely after Nenad's reraise. It seemed risky that EG would fold, and so I thought Nenad would call and perhaps push or check raise all-in on the turn. The only reasoning I can think of is that Nenad figured that EG was calling just about every bet, and would do so as well (and I guess he was right).

[/ QUOTE ]

It looked like Nedad had an open book on EG. Here's my guess as to what he was thinking. Nedad sees the stacks and knows EG is aware of them. Mimi was very short at the time and EG loved to push when it looked like he had some folding equity. Nedad then knows EG is very likely to push if he 3-bets. The downside to just calling EG's raise is that plenty of turn cards could slow EG down depending on what he has, such as a flush card when EG has two big cards or a pocket pair. If EG is on a flush draw, he'll probably push the flop anyway so slowplaying and waiting for him to hit doesn't help.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 05-26-2007, 04:05 PM
Rottersod Rottersod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Where I Want To Be
Posts: 3,154
Default Re: Foxwoods World Poker Finals thread

[ QUOTE ]
On the last hand did'nt it seem Nenad took an exceptionally long time to call EG's all in bet ?

The flop was 553 , Nenad had 75, then it came 9 9 for a board of 55399, and EG had bet the whole way.

I know that even if you know you're good and you're definetly gonna call, in such a crucial situation maybe he just wanted to rethink everything and take a good look at EG. Or maybe he realized he had it won and took a second to compose himself before he called.

I don't know , it just seemed like he took way too long. It almost seemed like he was about to fold it.

[/ QUOTE ]

He wasn't ever going to fold it but I'm sure he went back and replayed the hand and the betting to be as close to sure as it was possible to be that EG wasn't holding a 9. He knows he would have looked like a huge tool (cough...Phil Hellmuth...cough) if he had instacalled and EG had tuned over that 9 .
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 05-26-2007, 06:46 PM
gobboboy gobboboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Missing wraps.
Posts: 4,836
Default Re: Foxwoods World Poker Finals thread

Re: The T2s hand. I didn't see a hand all night where EG folded once he put money into the pot. Nenad probably picked up on that and decided EG was going with his hand regardless of what he had.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.