Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 04-17-2007, 10:20 PM
Ghazban Ghazban is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Gibbering incoherently
Posts: 5,805
Default Re: FTP Answers 4/17

[ QUOTE ]
8. Have some of the tables require a min of 50% buy in.

- As others have pointed out, we do have the "deep" tables which require a minimum of 100 BBs. For some reason only the lowest limit (which is the only one that only requires 50 BBs) goes off with any regularity. Hmmm...

[/ QUOTE ]

Part of the reason this doesn't work is that people want to play with poor players and poor players want to play limits they've seen in casinos (for the most part). You'll notice 2/4 and 5/10 no-limit are way more popular than 3/6. I'm pretty sure this is at least partially due to the fact that 2/4 (or 2/5) and 5/10 NL are spread live all over the place and 3/6 is spread roughly nowhere. A poor player will only rarely stumble onto a 7.50/15 NL table and games are built around poor players.

I bet if you raised the minimum buyin for one of your established limits to 50BB the fish would still play that level (most of them, anyway) and the people (like myself) who find playing against shortstackers uninteresting would be happy, too. It would be fantastic if such an experiment were carried out with the long-range intent of raising the minimum buy-in for all games on the site.




For the people that are going to flame me with "you suck because you can't adjust to shortstackers", I will make a preemptive reply. I have no problem at all adjusting to shortstackers. However, the game played correctly with them at the table is not much fun and it is less profitable. Even if it were equally profitable (or even slightly more profitable even), I would rather play poker with deeper stacks. Whether or not I can beat the shorties is not even relevant to the discussion.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 04-17-2007, 10:24 PM
cwar cwar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cwar LLC
Posts: 2,491
Default Re: FTP Answers 4/17

I am kind of conflicted about the <font color="red">LAG</font> now as it seems to have made the games somewhat softer. But HEK is right I think a lot of us 2p2ers will have to move some of our action to PS if the <font color="red">LAG </font> problems continue.

PS <font color="red">red is a scary color.</font>
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 04-17-2007, 11:09 PM
fozzy71 fozzy71 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Got Themes?
Posts: 2,013
Default Re: FTP Answers 4/17

i play 4-5 tables, and havent really noticed any lag issues with the new update... i did get it on occasion b4 this update, but not always. I guess I am lucky to havea 2.2ghz dual-core with 2gb ram [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 04-17-2007, 11:26 PM
cwar cwar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cwar LLC
Posts: 2,491
Default Re: FTP Answers 4/17

[ QUOTE ]
i play 4-5 tables, and havent really noticed any lag issues with the new update... i did get it on occasion b4 this update, but not always. I guess I am lucky to havea 2.2ghz dual-core with 2gb ram [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
Yea Im guessing that would do it.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 04-17-2007, 11:36 PM
7n7 7n7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,369
Default Re: FTP Answers 4/17

Any update with requesting hand histories via the client, ala PartyPoker? A feature that allows us to request up to a certain number is sorely needed due to disconnects.

Asking support to reply with hand histories has been, well, to put it as mildly as possible, a nightmare. I've requested hand histories on 3-4 different occasions and have never successfully received one yet. It's always, we're undergoing maintenance right now, blah, blah. Then a couple of days later, we're sorry, but we're unable to fulfill this request, blah, blah.

Hugely annoying.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 04-18-2007, 12:05 AM
questions questions is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 611
Default Re: FTP Answers 4/17

Doug, thanks for addressing the question about security, and sorry if I was ragging on you here. Looking forward to how you guys are going to approach that. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 04-18-2007, 12:52 AM
george w george w is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: austin, tx
Posts: 1,790
Default Re: FTP Answers 4/17

for the people bitching about the lag, why not just drop five hundo on a new machine and write it off?
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 04-18-2007, 12:58 AM
TheNoodleMan TheNoodleMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not using the back button
Posts: 6,873
Default Re: FTP Answers 4/17

[ QUOTE ]
for the people bitching about the lag, why not just drop five hundo on a new machine and write it off?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm running 2.13 GHz core 2 duo with 1gb of RAM.
That is far nicer than anything you'll get for $500 and the lag can be unbearable at 8 tables.

This isn't about our machines.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 04-18-2007, 01:18 AM
OHFreak OHFreak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
Posts: 1,691
Default Re: FTP Answers 4/17

Which frickin' deck do we have to change to get our waffle cards back? Wah.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 04-18-2007, 02:39 AM
prodonkey prodonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: underrating women on teh interweb
Posts: 5,993
Default Re: FTP Answers 4/17

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
for the people bitching about the lag, why not just drop five hundo on a new machine and write it off?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm running 2.13 GHz core 2 duo with 1gb of RAM.
That is far nicer than anything you'll get for $500 and the lag can be unbearable at 8 tables.

This isn't about our machines.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have a very similar computer with 2 gig of ram.. my lag usually comes from HUD eating up all the cpu due to having to use flicker free drawing. It usually takes up around 50% of the cpu.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.