Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > Tournament Circuit/WSOP
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 01-09-2007, 11:53 AM
UMTerp UMTerp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 2,965
Default Re: David Willams gets Gobbowned

[ QUOTE ]
what do you guys say when you mean UTG1 live?

this always bothers me

[/ QUOTE ]

"Second to act" works.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 01-09-2007, 01:01 PM
El Diablo El Diablo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 33,802
Default Re: David Willams gets Gobbowned

Chip,

"That was one sick call vs DW. If they don't respect his game yet, they will soon."

It's weird that someone would say this after it has already been shown in the thread what a horrible call it was.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 01-09-2007, 01:53 PM
Butcho22 Butcho22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Thinking about Tiger, ldo
Posts: 2,119
Default Re: David Willams gets Gobbowned

[ QUOTE ]
Chip,

"That was one sick call vs DW. If they don't respect his game yet, they will soon."

It's weird that someone would say this after it has already been shown in the thread what a horrible call it was.

[/ QUOTE ]

bout time you changed that avatar dontchathink?
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 01-09-2007, 05:53 PM
futuredoc85 futuredoc85 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 9,014
Default Re: David Willams gets Gobbowned

[ QUOTE ]
Chip,

"That was one sick call vs DW. If they don't respect his game yet, they will soon."

It's weird that someone would say this after it has already been shown in the thread what a horrible call it was.

[/ QUOTE ]

ummm no. it has been shown what a horrible call it was if gobbo had known williams hadnt looked at his cards and he was up against a random hand. good poker players arent up agaisnt random hands on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 01-09-2007, 06:25 PM
gobboboy gobboboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Missing wraps.
Posts: 4,836
Default Re: David Willams gets Gobbowned

Against a random hand I'm getting 2.5-1 on the river and I'm a 37% shot, so it's a good call even if I know he has a random hand. So I don't know how it's been shown that it's a terrible call.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 01-09-2007, 06:27 PM
List List is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 184
Default Re: David Willams gets Gobbowned

If he had known it was a random hand on the river he had odds to call.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 01-09-2007, 06:29 PM
futuredoc85 futuredoc85 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 9,014
Default Re: David Willams gets Gobbowned

[ QUOTE ]
Against a random hand I'm getting 2.5-1 on the river and I'm a 37% shot, so it's a good call even if I know he has a random hand. So I don't know how it's been shown that it's a terrible call.

[/ QUOTE ]

right, i was just stating that no one had even suggested it was a bad call without knowing.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 01-09-2007, 07:33 PM
rothko rothko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: nowhere, really
Posts: 5,437
Default Re: David Willams gets Gobbowned

this was a sick hand gobbo, especially considering dw called you out. sounds to me like dw felt like an idiot once you called, so he made up some bs about not looking. dunno.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 01-09-2007, 08:14 PM
pocketjesuits pocketjesuits is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 356
Default Re: David Willams gets Gobbowned

[ QUOTE ]

this was a sick hand gobbo, especially considering dw called you out. sounds to me like dw felt like an idiot once you called, so he made up some bs about not looking. dunno.

[/ QUOTE ]

Quite possible.
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 01-10-2007, 04:35 AM
El Diablo El Diablo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 33,802
Default Re: David Willams gets Gobbowned

gobbo,

My bad. I had read on one of the sites that David made a "large overbet" and assumed that was correct and he had made a bet significantly larger than the pot. However, looking at the updated account w/ bet sizes and listening to your interview (btw, nice job not slapping her when she asked how you came to that decision), I realize that they were simply talking about a "large bet."

Nonetheless, my general comment still stands. I don't see how your analysis or play is worthy of much celebration given the fact that David did not look at his cards (assuming that is correct).

I'm sure you made plenty of excellent plays to put yourself in the position you got to deep in the tourney. I bet there were a number of hands that you actually better played than this, but instead people are imo focusing on the wrong things.

Hope that makes sense and congrats on the finish, even though the end was sorta disappointing.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.