About the PokerRoom X-mas tourney

[WhatDoesCallMean]

[ QUOTE ]
Btw guys, thanks for fleeing OnGame, the fewer winning players the better [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

you dont actually expect a massive exodus from OnGame do you?

flashbacks - im leaving Party......im leaving Stars......im leaving Crypto.....im leaving OnGame cos of high rake....blah blah blah

[HeavilyArmed]

[ QUOTE ]
Ladies and gentlemen, please put down your pitchforks and torches

[/ QUOTE ]

Wrong attitude. Wrong timing.

You'll continue to pay for poor decisions. A $19k mistake will cost you ten fold at a minimum.

[Nina]

Yeah, it took you TOO LONG to say "Darn! We are losing too many customers and getting bad publicity -guess we have to pay those players." Far too long...

[Soulman]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Btw guys, thanks for fleeing OnGame, the fewer winning players the better [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

you dont actually expect a massive exodus from OnGame do you?


[/ QUOTE ]
Nah.

[MicroBob]

[ QUOTE ]

I seriously don't get why anyone would bother to defend their actions on a message board - they'll get shot in the head no matter what basically. lol.

[/ QUOTE ]


not really.
If he had taken the approach that Suzzer or I recommended the response would have been a lot better.

They really wasn't much about their actions that they should have been 'defending' anyway because they were just so bad.

But coming on here and saying, "We really screwed up. We've learned a lot and are making dramatic changes," (without the part about blaming their customers) would have been good.

[cha59]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I seriously don't get why anyone would bother to defend their actions on a message board - they'll get shot in the head no matter what basically. lol.

[/ QUOTE ]


not really.
If he had taken the approach that Suzzer or I recommended the response would have been a lot better.

They really wasn't much about their actions that they should have been 'defending' anyway because they were just so bad.

But coming on here and saying, "We really screwed up. We've learned a lot and are making dramatic changes," (without the part about blaming their customers) would have been good.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you see why Oskar?

[DMoogle]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I seriously don't get why anyone would bother to defend their actions on a message board - they'll get shot in the head no matter what basically. lol.

[/ QUOTE ]


not really.
If he had taken the approach that Suzzer or I recommended the response would have been a lot better.

They really wasn't much about their actions that they should have been 'defending' anyway because they were just so bad.

But coming on here and saying, "We really screwed up. We've learned a lot and are making dramatic changes," (without the part about blaming their customers) would have been good.

[/ QUOTE ]
That, and if they gave the people who this affected a little extra (not sure what, maybe a free entry into another big tournament?) would've made them look really good.

[MicroBob]

This would have been a nice way to apologize for the horrible way they were treated as well as win public-favor with the masses.

It definitely would have been the right thing to do.

[LotteryOrPoker]

Care to explain why PokerRoom still considers multi account players a joke and those who report them "snitches?"

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...e=0#Post8759146