|
|
#62
08-15-2007, 04:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Regs Thread
Oh btw who do you think are good at 1/2
The following players seems to annoy me the most KrucheVseh Tokenblak Loeppenthin sidis____ Might not necessary be the biggest winners but definatly annoying (I wont discuss what makes them annoying since I think it's bad form just that they are difficult to play against) There are also a number of 18-16/14-12/4-3 players that probably makes good money from fish but are relativly easier to play against. |
|
#64
08-15-2007, 06:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
I wondered what you guys thought of the jackpot tables vs the normal tables for nl100 [/ QUOTE ] I try to avoid them for 100NL as the rake is just too high. I would generally only play them if I couldn't find any decent normal tables or there was a really big fish on one of them. At 200NL I'd generally head towards normal tables first but wouldn't be as worried. 400NL+ it wouldn't affect my table selection much at all. |
|
#65
08-15-2007, 06:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Regs Thread
i changed my screenname back in july and i dont really play 200nl anymore, but i would be interested to hear anyones thoughts on my play if they remember back that far.
my sn was fitboy912. |
|
#66
08-15-2007, 06:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Thoughts on ImACrazyLAG (me) ? I already know that I'm not a LAG. [/ QUOTE ] You are way to nitty preflop and to passive postflop, and it tilts me every time im stacked with QQ in reraised pot vs you [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] |
|
#67
08-15-2007, 06:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Oh btw who do you think are good at 1/2 The following players seems to annoy me the most KrucheVseh Tokenblak Loeppenthin sidis____ [/ QUOTE ] Yes I also think KrucheVseh is annoying to play against, very aggressive. A lot the Russian players seem to be like that. sidis___ plays vey tight. I've played more than 1000 hands with him but only have one note on him, so obviously we haven't tangled much. Fitness freak, I thought you were a pretty good player. |
|
#68
08-15-2007, 06:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Thoughts on ImACrazyLAG (me) ? I already know that I'm not a LAG. [/ QUOTE ] I think i've 3 bet you very light on occasions solely based on your screen name. Other than that i can't really remember much! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] There's a couple of players i'd like opinions on, but i'll have to wait to get home before i can find their names. I'm not sure if its since i've started table selecting or what, but i feel there's a bunch of good regulars at party 200NL, but very very few great ones(naturally). Also, do people feel there's a huge gap between 200 and 400? I just can't seem to win at 2/4 in the 3 shots of taken. |
|
#69
08-15-2007, 07:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Also, do people feel there's a huge gap between 200 and 400? I just can't seem to win at 2/4 in the 3 shots of taken. [/ QUOTE ] there is a huge difference in the standard style of play between the two, and there are definitely less fish and bad reg's at 2/4, but the games are still very very beatable if you can adjust your strategy accordingly and use a bit of game selection. |
|
#70
08-15-2007, 07:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Regs Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Talking about Montagnais specifically is the definition of stupid if you thought the wait list was bad before imagine how it will be when it doubles... Also you are not Crazy enough... [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] What??? HE PWNS ALL OF US I seriously think he is not a fish. I started winning against him (got an ok-ish read on his bet-sizes and started calling some of his huge bets reallllly light), and now he doesn't pay me off at all anymore / leaves my tables. I think he has developed a style that just destroys unobservent regs. He can definitely read boards well, and constantly puts you to tough decisions. |
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
