#61
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LionelHutz00
Leader,
Why do you disagree? Why do you think it is a bad policy to say "2+2 is a place where inline posting of bestiality or scat porn pics is not allowed, and those actions are so offensive that doing them will result in account deletion."? |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LionelHutz00
[ QUOTE ]
Leader, Why do you disagree? Why do you think it is a bad policy to say "2+2 is a place where inline posting of bestiality or scat porn pics is not allowed, and those actions are so offensive that doing them will result in account deletion."? [/ QUOTE ] Don't know what more you want me to say. I think 2+2 benefits more from not banning valuable posters permanently and potentially losing them then it does from the deterrent value of such a policy. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LionelHutz00
Leader,
Fair enough. I didn't mean to imply there was anything wrong with you being into scat porn and bestiality, it's just not my thing is all. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LionelHutz00
Moderator(s) notified In a moment you will be automatically returned to the forum.
Return to Forum lol let's see what happens |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LionelHutz00
Leader et al,
Do you think there is any sort of post that merits banning permanently? I have to assume not in the porn or gross direction. Say a poster like LionelHutz00 did a sort of Rickroll style hidden link where it installed a virus which immediately formatted the persons hard drive? Would that merit banning? |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LionelHutz00
right hahahahaha i'm glad we're getting down to the heart of the matter here. apparently some mods think nothing merits a permaban on the first offense.
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LionelHutz00
[ QUOTE ]
All, Here is my suggestion for a policy: If someone posts inline scat porn pics or inline bestiality pics their account should be nuked. Agree/disagree? [/ QUOTE ] I assume a policy is the same as a rule? My opinion probably won't be very popular (especially with El Diablo). I disagree with that statement being a policy or a rule. One reason is lets say Mat and Kiera have a fight. She is looking for revenge. Kiera posts bestiality porn under Mat's screen name. Should Mat be nuked/banned? No - he is an admin so he gets an exception. What if my girlfriend did the same thing? She would be a likely candidate as she can be totally crazy! Should I get nuked? What about <insert your forums most valuable poster here>? Where do we draw the line? Should drunk posters be handled differently? How do we know when someone was drunk or posted under someone else's account? I would agree with 'sentencing guidelines' with punishment ranges. But, I think that would be far too much work and the current 'common sense approach' usually works very well. I think the mod crew overall does does a great job and utilizes common sense very well. (Now that we got rid of that damn sniper! Just kidding! :> ) I think it is best to rehab valuable posters when possible rather than nuking their account and forcing them 'to start over'. Thank you, Jim Kuhn Catfish4u [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LionelHutz00
[ QUOTE ]
Leader et al, Do you think there is any sort of post that merits banning permanently? I have to assume not in the porn or gross direction. Say a poster like LionelHutz00 did a sort of Rickroll style hidden link where it installed a virus which immediately formatted the persons hard drive? Would that merit banning? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah I would permaban the guy for that, but I think the situations are different. Someone would never do that "to get some time off" or think it was some funny joke. Something like can only be done to intentionally cause permanent damage. I'd have very serious doubts that anyone that did that would refrain from doing it again. In this case, he probably didn't even realize the damage he could have done. Now he gets it and won't do it again. I have a hard time envisioning how that could be true in your example. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LionelHutz00
new Lionel Hutz?
both IPs from california. is there any way to tell if this is him or if it's some copycat? if it's him circumventing his ban, i really think it's time for a perma-shitcan. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Re: LionelHutz00
[ QUOTE ]
new Lionel Hutz? both IPs from california. is there any way to tell if this is him or if it's some copycat? if it's him circumventing his ban, i really think it's time for a perma-shitcan. [/ QUOTE ] LOL, this is so funny. |
|
|