FGATORS- STILL WAITING FOR EV GRAPH

[excession]

what stakes are these?
what site? stars mostly right?
Surely any sort of RB/FPP deal would mean that the minus.35PTBB/100 is wiped out and he is comfortably up lifetime

He is probably stars Nova and driving one of his 3 porsches around right now ... [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[carol-ann]

[ QUOTE ]
edit: why are u still on this site if u really believe all that?

[/ QUOTE ]like FGators, to minimize my losses from rake to a minimum; mostly by listening to the advice of a select group of 8 to 10 posters

[holland3r]

[ QUOTE ]
The blue and red line will be practically on top of one another, going up to some hefty sum of Sklansky bucks like $100k. The green line will be erratic but will stay around $0. I'd make an MSPaint but I'm at work and don't know my Photobucket password.

Edit: Actually I bet the Sklansky bux will be higher, several hundred thousand probably.

[/ QUOTE ]

Quoting myself from 1st thread.

If you know anything about PokerEV and FGators, this is the obvious answer.

[PJo336]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
edit: why are u still on this site if u really believe all that?

[/ QUOTE ]like FGators, to minimize my losses from rake to a minimum; mostly by listening to the advice of a select group of 8 to 10 posters

[/ QUOTE ]

BTYS can help u minimize, ur just not listening, LISTEN TO BTYS

[excession]

yes - it shows he is a weak-tight nit - mind you some WT nits make good money at low stakes - not all though..

[carol-ann]

[ QUOTE ]
Edit: Actually I bet the Sklansky bux will be higher, several hundred thousand probably.

[/ QUOTE ]why will that be the case? (geniunely interested)

[carol-ann]

[ QUOTE ]
BTYS can help u minimize, ur just not listening, LISTEN TO BTYS

[/ QUOTE ]That won't work. BTYS is (or at least was) a 37/13/0.6 while the stats I strive to loosen up to are something like 14/6/8 (won$at SD at least 20% higher than won$when saw flop).

[holland3r]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Edit: Actually I bet the Sklansky bux will be higher, several hundred thousand probably.

[/ QUOTE ]why will that be the case? (geniunely interested)

[/ QUOTE ]

I meant showdown winnings/Sklansky bucks -- that is keeping track of how much he wins when he shows down. Obviously since he's weak/tight he's showing down the winning hand more often than the losing hand, and over 1.6 million hands this adds up to a lot of showdown winnings.

Of course since he's very exploitable by good tag/lags and doesn't valuebet his actual winnings remain around $0 (and actually end up at -$20k)

[PJo336]

14/6?? but i loveee QJ and 89 and i will continue to play them

[carol-ann]

[ QUOTE ]
14/6?? but i loveee QJ and 89 and i will continue to play them

[/ QUOTE ]We should stop hijacking this thread, but the more hands you play = the more rake you pay. Keep playing those unpaired hands which cannot even make sets and you will lose more to rake than others.