If I could have any RB/WR/TE on my favorite NFL team....

[ADLinden]

cleveland......any defensive player from any team

[THAY3R]

FWIW my answer would be Reggie Bush.

Very young, with a very low workload in college = longer durability/prime.

Also, he is a sick returner and great reciever.


I really don't think it's close either. (If we're talking just RB's)

[capone0]

What team to you like Thay3r?

[Jack of Arcades]

He's a Jets fan.

[RedBean]

[ QUOTE ]
FWIW my answer would be Reggie Bush.

Very young, with a very low workload in college = longer durability/prime.

Also, he is a sick returner and great reciever.


I really don't think it's close either. (If we're talking just RB's)

[/ QUOTE ]

Adrian Peterson doesn't think it's close either, but he thinks you got the answer wrong.

[capone0]

Only real advantage of Bush over Peterson is injury concerns. The way Peterson runs he seems to be very prone to injuries. Individual game wise I like Peterson over Bush. For his career, I might lean towards Bush over my earlier concern.

[THAY3R]

Bush v AP:

1) AP Has more career touches
2) Bush is younger
3) Bush is a much better reciever
4) AP has an injury history

[Kneel B4 Zod]

I think Peterson > Bush

[Needle77]

Where would McFadden rate on most of your guys list, for those that want RB's? I'm assuming he'd be low but I have only heard good things about that guy. I just don't know anything about him. (I will say that the only scouts I followed in the past draft were the Jags scouts and they had AP as their #1 player on their value board. I guess they hit that one on the dot, be interesting to see what other teams had him ranked).

[hoyasnaxa]

[ QUOTE ]
FWIW my answer would be Reggie Bush.

Very young, with a very low workload in college = longer durability/prime.

Also, he is a sick returner and great reciever.


I really don't think it's close either. (If we're talking just RB's)

[/ QUOTE ]

Level?