|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: which handle should i use 4 stars? | |||
| lolbbvaments |
   
|
7 | 10.77% |
| mike oxinyermom |
  
|
3 | 4.62% |
| sirpwnsalot |
  
|
8 | 12.31% |
| kneegroplz |
  
|
15 | 23.08% |
| good4me2poopon |
  
|
6 | 9.23% |
| BASTARD! FACK OOT! |
  
|
26 | 40.00% |
| Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#641
10-18-2007, 12:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
wook,
so is this a confession, mr. nash? |
|
#642
10-18-2007, 01:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] From a game theory perspective this is a great way to get a bunch of gimick accounts to show up. [/ QUOTE ] in order of likelihood: 1. bravos1 2. bravos1 3. bravos1 4. unterfish 5. xylocain 6. bravos1 [/ QUOTE ] Although I think Nash is a great gimmick.. he is not mine, but if I were not me, I'd agree w/ your list.. well except I wouldn't put unterfish on this one. My list: Buzz Boz BBB Tyler Wookie (except he is sleeping) Ozi [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] (BAN! if true LDO) Gib <-- dark horse! [/ QUOTE ] I thought bravos too, but then I knew you don't really gimmick it up. My choices are, with probabilities: .18 Marchron .15 Nomad .15 Wookie .15 KO .12 Gib .12 Benny .11 BBB .02 Aaron_W [/ QUOTE ] Honored, but not me. Most of JN's posts are from January '06, and whoever it is decided to dust it off 21 months later for that one-liner. I'd never remember a password for that long without using it, and besides that I've never seen the movie. |
|
#643
10-18-2007, 01:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
[ QUOTE ]
I thought bravos too, but then I knew you don't really gimmick it up. My choices are, with probabilities: .18 Marchron .15 Nomad .15 Wookie .15 KO .12 Gib .12 Benny .11 BBB .02 Aaron_W [/ QUOTE ] Yesss!!! I finally made a list of posters! I never make lists of posters! Nevermind that I'd have to google John Nash to know who he is... I made a list! I feel like I just won a viewer's choice award. |
|
#644
10-18-2007, 01:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
[ QUOTE ]
Nevermind that I'd have to google John Nash to know who he is... I made a list! [/ QUOTE ] Brag: Nash guest-lectured a maths course I took at Princeton. Beat: I overslept on the day of the final of that course, and my ham-handed prof gave me an F on it, rather than letting me come in for the last half and try to finish it up. Variance: I got a C+ for the course, even though the final was supposed to be worth 60% of my final grade. Variance 2: Nobody knew who John Nash was in 1986. |
|
#646
10-18-2007, 04:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
|
|
#647
10-18-2007, 05:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
[ QUOTE ]
Honored, but not me. Most of JN's posts are from January '06, and whoever it is decided to dust it off 21 months later for that one-liner. I'd never remember a password for that long without using it, and besides that I've never seen the movie. [/ QUOTE ] Like all good gimmicks I was made for a single post in a single thread because I was mentioned. My other posts could come from where my creator was using this account to sway polls and just forgot and posted under this account, or for other one liners. My creator just happened to remember me when the idea of a gimmick account NC thread was mentioned, and of course he was smart enough to have all his passwords written down. I find it odd that this name was not used for a previous gimmick account before '06 being that this is a forum created to discuss game theory and mathmatical probability |
|
#648
10-18-2007, 05:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
[ QUOTE ]
Yesss!!! I finally made a list of posters! I never make lists of posters! [/ QUOTE ] Agreed, this makes my day. Though as a movie theater projectionist for the past 6 years I was aware of who John Nash was because of the movie. |
|
#649
10-18-2007, 05:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
[ QUOTE ]
so im playing at ipoker now and instead of giving players/flop they give players/4thStreet as a stat. I assume they are calling the turn 4th street and not the flop.....but now Im thinking that doesnt old school SuperSystem refer to the flop as 4th street or something? assuming Im just not tired and screwing this up, anyone got any thoughts on how to interpret this beyond just higher is better? [/ QUOTE ] Did you accidentally walk into a stud game? |
|
#650
10-18-2007, 05:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Finally having some winning sessions again! Favorite hand of the night: UTG straddles, I 3bet with black 99, MP caps, straddler and I call. Flop: 983 2 diamonds, checked around (d'oh!). Turn Ad. UTG checks, I check, MP bets, UTG calls, I raise and MP insta-3bets. His quickness means he has a set or flush more than AK sadly so I just call. River random diamond. I bet and he folds AA face up. lol B&Maments. [/ QUOTE ] wow MP is bad [/ QUOTE ] the sad part is he was probably the best of my opponents at the table at the time. I think I've found a goldmine. |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
