Official SSSH LC/NC Thread for October!

[Absolution]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Oink
calling station

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT

[/ QUOTE ]

wtf??

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you deny your callingstationossity?

[/ QUOTE ]

Here Oink, I made a cut and paste for you:

Well, this card makes it more likely that he has a draw so therefore I call down baring a few specific cards.

[danzasmack]

Oh man i forgot!

Yesterday I set a personal record by calling the river 4 times with jack on an AKxyz board knowing full well this man had no pair no draw.

I lost all 4 times to queen hi.

Four times I did this in one day.

[sethypooh21]

[ QUOTE ]
Here Oink, I made a cut and paste for you:

Well, this card makes it more likely that he has a draw so therefore I call down baring a few specific cards.

[/ QUOTE ]

Even though we play similarly, my rationale is more like "Why am I calling down? [censored] him, that's why."

[Absolution]

[ QUOTE ]
Oh man i forgot!

Yesterday I set a personal record by calling the river 4 times with jack on an AKxyz board knowing full well this man had no pair no draw.

I lost all 4 times to queen hi.

Four times I did this in one day.

[/ QUOTE ]

I had one of those days 2 days ago. If I had A9 he had AJ, If I had Q9, he had QJ, if he had A9 I had A7. Those are annoying because you're making a good read, but it turns out that his bluff was actually a value bet. Oh, and if it was the other way around then I get counterfeited for a tie (e.g. I have AJ on a A225 board, he has A9 and bloats the pot, then the river is a Q.) It's akin to when you're calling down a bluffer who you have dominated and then he hits his 3 outer on the river.

[Absolution]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Here Oink, I made a cut and paste for you:

Well, this card makes it more likely that he has a draw so therefore I call down baring a few specific cards.

[/ QUOTE ]

Even though we play similarly, my rationale is more like "Why am I calling down? [censored] him, that's why."

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I use the Schneid's theory (I don't think it was him who said this, but someone in BBV): If I can think of 1 hand that I beat on the river that he would play like this I call.

[Heisenb3rg]

Abs: Not all tables are that fishy @ 10/20..

One table in particular last night had 3 super fish.. one of the best tables I played in a long long time. 3/5 of those hands were at that table.

Net loss @ this table = -1200$

For person moving from NL:
Start off no higher than 2/4...
Seriously unless you have decent experience in limit you will probabily be a losing player. The concepts in limit are much more unintuitive than in no-limit. With some solid thinking/reading experience it shouldnt take too long to beat these limits.. But just starting out, youll probabily be losing.

Oink:
Get money.

[sethypooh21]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Here Oink, I made a cut and paste for you:

Well, this card makes it more likely that he has a draw so therefore I call down baring a few specific cards.

[/ QUOTE ]

Even though we play similarly, my rationale is more like "Why am I calling down? [censored] him, that's why."

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I use the Schneid's theory (I don't think it was him who said this, but someone in BBV): If I can think of 1 hand that I beat on the river that he would play like this I call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Same thing, but I like swearing...

[Oink]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Here Oink, I made a cut and paste for you:

Well, this card makes it more likely that he has a draw so therefore I call down baring a few specific cards.

[/ QUOTE ]

Even though we play similarly, my rationale is more like "Why am I calling down? [censored] him, that's why."

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I use the Schneid's theory (I don't think it was him who said this, but someone in BBV): If I can think of 1 hand that I beat on the river that he would play like this I call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wasnt it that guy who claims to be Hoss' fanclub?

BTW ty for the copy paste. It will come in handy [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[sethypooh21]

GG Absolute:

[ QUOTE ]
meanwhile, more breaking news, from sources at AP that will remain nameless:

The Potripper account belongs to AJ Green, former Director of Operations at AP and Scott Tom's best friend. AJ Green is currently VP of operations at nine.com.

[/ QUOTE ]

[Absolution]

The story has hit the front page of Digg.