New Software SpadeEye: Tableselection (@PP)

[BuddyQ]

How about a classification for "anti-buddy," like you know a regular shark you don't want to play with. LIke you have a table with 1 drooling fish but 4 known sharks, you move on? (I you can't really see a shark just from his stats, some with the same stats suck, but you know sharks by playing with them, then tag them as sharks) Make any sense?

[meleader2]

[ QUOTE ]
How about a classification for "anti-buddy," like you know a regular shark you don't want to play with. LIke you have a table with 1 drooling fish but 4 known sharks, you move on? (I you can't really see a shark just from his stats, some with the same stats suck, but you know sharks by playing with them, then tag them as sharks) Make any sense?

[/ QUOTE ]

in the bottom frame after ur scan there's a list of # tables next to a players name. take 5 min and open players with > 6 tables running and mark them orange, with no notes, and orange is just a standard way for you to know that that person is a multi tabler.

after a while u'll get all the regulars and u know who to avoid rather easily.

[Notorious_JC]

I have a suggestion Snood.

When I run a Tablescan, about 5-10% of the tables return 0 results (for whatever reason). I have to manually scan these tables one at a time to get complete results.

I suggest re-scanning the tables that return "0" after the first pass, if this is possible.

JC

[Kairos]

Spadeeye doesnt account for split pots correctly when datamining:

***** Hand History for Game 6408261711 *****
$200 USD NL Texas Hold'em - Saturday, October 13, 10:24:03 ET 2007
Table Table 125917 (6 max) (Real Money)
Seat 6 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 3: Just_a_hunch ( $291.55 USD )
Seat 4: Szilard83 ( $340.65 USD )
Seat 6: Snoop817 ( $507.99 USD )
Seat 1: ILuv20_2yos ( $201 USD )
Seat 5: numone86 ( $209.10 USD )
Seat 2: No_Luck0r ( $48 USD )
ILuv20_2yos posts small blind [$1 USD].
No_Luck0r posts big blind [$2 USD].
** Dealing down cards **
Just_a_hunch raises [$8 USD]
Szilard83 folds.
numone86 folds.
Snoop817 folds.
ILuv20_2yos raises [$24 USD]
No_Luck0r folds.
Just_a_hunch calls [$17 USD]
** Dealing Flop ** [ 9c, 2c, 3s ]
ILuv20_2yos bets [$36 USD]
Just_a_hunch raises [$150 USD]
ILuv20_2yos is all-In.
Just_a_hunch calls [$26 USD]
** Dealing Turn ** [ Jc ]
** Dealing River ** [ 9d ]
Just_a_hunch shows [ Qs, Qh ]two pairs, Queens and Nines.
ILuv20_2yos shows [ Qc, Qd ]two pairs, Queens and Nines.
ILuv20_2yos wins $200.50 USD from the main pot with two pairs, Queens and Nines.

When imported into PT it shows that Just_a_hunch loses $200 in this hand.

[ski]

Nevermind..I fixed the issue...

Is it possible to datamine more than 1 level at once?

I'd like to datamine 25/50 then 10/20 then 5/10 depending on how many games there are (usually there are not 12 25/50 and 10/20 games going at once). When i do it it always just fills up on the current level.

Thx.

[omaha]

When i scan all tables (at party), all the jackpot tables come up. I have unticked the box in the options menu, so they dont open when i autoscan.

Is there some way to NOT scan any jackpot tables. This would speed things up significantly, and seriously reduce my table clutter!

[Mr_Snood]

Currently one can only exclude the Jackpot tables from datamining.

I will add an option to exclude them from scan, too.

[Mr_Snood]

Unfortunately all you can do is to add the desired stakes under "main"->"options"->"limits".

SpadeEye then datamines the first stake and if there are not enough tables it switches to the next stake from the list (and so on).

[Mr_Snood]

Are you sure ILuv20_2yos did not have the better kicker?

I mean SpadeEye just reads the result from the PartyPoker memory. It does not evaluate the showdown.
It just copies what PartyPoker says...

[Mr_Snood]

On what Pokersite do you encounter this problem?

I will rather spent time on getting a result from the first scan than scanning over and over [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

If nothing helps i can rescan all "0 tables".