Poker Stars Regulars

[bottomset]

[ QUOTE ]
lol two;

You have a whole lot to learn.

This is a simple example and one you should understand. I play 9 tables. Say you sit with me on two of those tables and we play 24 hours straight. You could have 10,000 hands on me. Those 10,000 hands could say that I am -2,300 and I am a horrible player. In that same time, I could be +5000 on the day because of my other 7 tables. I think that should be easily understood as to why you are way off on this subject.

I hope this is leveling.

[/ QUOTE ]

pokerboy was down a bunch over my sample with him, and I think he said I was down in his DB as well

same goes for a bunch of other regs, its the nature of only seeing a tiny % of the hands they play

[NL__Fool]

[ QUOTE ]
pokerboy was down a bunch over my sample with him, and I think he said I was down in his DB as well

[/ QUOTE ]

I have about 9K hands on Pokerboy and in my database he is running at .22 PTBB/100 He's up $39 or so.

I know he's a lot better then that, you need a ton of hands to get someones winrate

[TwoNitty]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
pokerboy was down a bunch over my sample with him, and I think he said I was down in his DB as well

[/ QUOTE ]

I have about 9K hands on Pokerboy and in my database he is running at .22 PTBB/100 He's up $39 or so.

I know he's a lot better then that, you need a ton of hands to get someones winrate

[/ QUOTE ]

I have 6k on him at -1.74. He must suck?

[coordi]

Every 2+2 reg I know is down in my DB. On the flip side a bunch of people I know to be terrible terrible players are up in my db. Thats just how it happens sometimes.

[Jeff76]

I have BT2 down $70 . . .

Of course, I DID suck out on him in a $100 pot . . . [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[Raised2Win]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
well u can see from his went to showdown and won at showdown he was running terrible on that shot.

[/ QUOTE ]

How does that prove he's running terrible and not that he takes [censored] hands to showdown? I have a hard time believe anybody playing 13/4 can be very good.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well he only went to showdown 18% of the time which is low, ofcourse he could have went to showdown with [censored], but then he would have been card dead. Im not saying he is a great player, im not even saying he is very good but he is definetly a winner at 200nl.

[BeatPurdue]

For those of you who are playing 2/4 FR on stars is the gameplay that much different than from 1/2?

I am thinking of making the jump, but I am wondering how much tougher the regs are there.

[Phresh]

I'm sure you can beat it. Some of the regs are tougher, but you should be able to adjust.

[Body Man D]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm sure you can beat it. Some of the regs are tougher, but you should be able to adjust.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed, and I've also found that some of the non regs are even worse than at 1/2 for some reason.

[Mr_Donktastic]

[ QUOTE ]
Agreed, and I've also found that some of the non regs are even worse than at 1/2 for some reason.

[/ QUOTE ]

I haven't played that much 2/4 but I would agree with this - its weird how bad some of them can be.

But some the regs are MUCH better than your avg 1/2 reg so the daytime games can be pretty brutal.