FGators graph thread [modnote: read the end, it's even worse]

[LearnedfromTV]

Also, Gild, I've done enough quoting, but that Robert Ebert thing is awesome.

[Lori]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
oops, 1.6

[/ QUOTE ]

no, 1.2 is correct. He peaked around hand 400k.

[/ QUOTE ]

Speaking of which, I bet most people here would have said he was a winning player if he posted his stats at 400k. I doubt the winning period was just variance, he just introduced a leak into his game and is in too much denial to acknowledge it.

[/ QUOTE ]

The person who said it was probably dated Oct 1 2006 made a lot of sense to me.

<font color="white"> Lori </font>

[derosnec]

looks like he had about 11,000 all ins.

so, his postflop skills aside, for you math people out there, is it basically beyond the realm of probaility for him to run bad over 11,000 all-ins? by run bad i mean both getting coolered (set over set/straight over set, etc.) and getting sucked out on.

[fnord_too]

My lame attempts:

[FGators]

Yeah go ahead and post some hands of where I fold before showdown or lose with aces or kings

[DonKaleone]

I'm too lazy to make a picture, but somebody should do "After the first 1,6 million hands, if you can't spot the sucker, it's you".

[hra146]

Allright, update:

My laptop is being a [censored] and my super-computer is obv. busy producing a 1.6m hands EV graph. Im gonna stop posting / providing hhs from FGators and let the system focus on its special task.


ETA for 1.6m hands EV graph: 3 - 6 hours

[ArdyJay]

you can do it fagtors! your on an upswing playing well, go go go!

[thac]

[ QUOTE ]
Allright, update:

My laptop is being a [censored] and my super-computer is obv. busy producing a 1.6m hands EV graph. Im gonna stop posting / providing hhs from FGators and let the system focus on its special task.


ETA for 1.6m hands EV graph: 3 - 6 hours

[/ QUOTE ]

YESSSSSSSSSSSS

[BowToYourSensei]