|
|
#51
07-13-2005, 07:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: So, I e-mailed Kwazar/his GF/whoever the heck that is
[ QUOTE ]
and got this in response: [ QUOTE ] [censored] you. You have NO idea what you're talking about. Yes he shows in the standings..and there is a reason why, but it isn't what you think. [/ QUOTE ] a little hostile for someone who is seeking clarification (I think I was pretty diplomatic in my e-mail). [/ QUOTE ] Why wouldn't they say the reason???????? 
|
|
#53
07-13-2005, 08:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: So, I e-mailed Kwazar/his GF/whoever the heck that is
[ QUOTE ]
Wish I could edit the post title to "KWAZAR gets owned by OOT part 2" [/ QUOTE ] Nice find anyways. I made a WPT thread about him in the wsop.
|
|
#56
07-13-2005, 08:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: So, I e-mailed Kwazar/his GF/whoever the heck that is
[ QUOTE ]
there is a reason why, but it isn't what you think. [/ QUOTE ] Put yourself in this person's shoes for a minute. Now try to think of ONE possible series of events that would explain KWAZAR's appearance on the WSOP chip count list, but would not be simple and easy to explain to someone who sent you an e-mail. I honestly can't. -dB
|
|
#57
07-13-2005, 08:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: So, I e-mailed Kwazar/his GF/whoever the heck that is
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] there is a reason why, but it isn't what you think. [/ QUOTE ] Put yourself in this person's shoes for a minute. Now try to think of ONE possible series of events that would explain KWAZAR's appearance on the WSOP chip count list, but would not be simple and easy to explain to someone who sent you an e-mail. I honestly can't. -dB [/ QUOTE ] no-showed and blinded off? would be simple and easy to explain, unless you're a moran...
|
|
#58
07-13-2005, 08:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: So, I e-mailed Kwazar/his GF/whoever the heck that is
[ QUOTE ]
no-showed and blinded off? would be simple and easy to explain, unless you're a moran... [/ QUOTE ] and tripled his stack in the process? CP had him at 29K after the first session.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
