#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Yeah but couldn't you equally say my opponents suck for allowing themselves to get stacked in an unraised pot when they know they have the same hand and no redraws? (Though one of them does have a backdoor flush). [/ QUOTE ] yeah my bad, obviously your opponents are terrible for getting their money in with the actual nuts and your unconventional play was simply you adapting to exploit their obvious leak [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, I hadn't realised stacking off with a flopped straight no redraw when you know one opponent has the same hand is good Omaha. [/ QUOTE ] guess its still ok if you know that someone will call all-in with a bare flush draw, amirite? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I was getting the right odds to draw to my flush, no? |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
http://twodimes.net/h/?z=3827286
pokenum -o 6c kc 2h 2s - kd jd 4s ts - kh jh 3s 9d -- ac qc th Omaha Hi: 666 enumerated boards containing Ac Qc Th cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV 2s Kc 6c 2h 289 43.39 377 56.61 0 0.00 0.434 Ts 4s Kd Jd 17 2.55 325 48.80 324 48.65 0.269 3s 9d Kh Jh 36 5.41 306 45.95 324 48.65 0.297 |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Yeah but couldn't you equally say my opponents suck for allowing themselves to get stacked in an unraised pot when they know they have the same hand and no redraws? (Though one of them does have a backdoor flush). [/ QUOTE ] yeah my bad, obviously your opponents are terrible for getting their money in with the actual nuts and your unconventional play was simply you adapting to exploit their obvious leak [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, I hadn't realised stacking off with a flopped straight no redraw when you know one opponent has the same hand is good Omaha. [/ QUOTE ] But stacking off with a bare flush draw with a two pair redraw is the awesome. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Yeah but couldn't you equally say my opponents suck for allowing themselves to get stacked in an unraised pot when they know they have the same hand and no redraws? (Though one of them does have a backdoor flush). [/ QUOTE ] yeah my bad, obviously your opponents are terrible for getting their money in with the actual nuts and your unconventional play was simply you adapting to exploit their obvious leak [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, I hadn't realised stacking off with a flopped straight no redraw when you know one opponent has the same hand is good Omaha. [/ QUOTE ] But stacking off with a bare flush draw with a two pair redraw is the awesome. [/ QUOTE ] Yes but it wasn't heads up. I'm getting 3-2 on my money. That changes things, surely? |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
Do you realise that in hand 1 you can't make a straight if a J comes because you must use two of your hole cards in omaha fishyjimm?
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
[ QUOTE ]
Do you realise that in hand 1 you can't make a straight if a J comes because you must use two of your hole cards in omaha fishyjimm? [/ QUOTE ] BAN |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Yeah but couldn't you equally say my opponents suck for allowing themselves to get stacked in an unraised pot when they know they have the same hand and no redraws? (Though one of them does have a backdoor flush). [/ QUOTE ] yeah my bad, obviously your opponents are terrible for getting their money in with the actual nuts and your unconventional play was simply you adapting to exploit their obvious leak [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, I hadn't realised stacking off with a flopped straight no redraw when you know one opponent has the same hand is good Omaha. [/ QUOTE ] But stacking off with a bare flush draw with a two pair redraw is the awesome. [/ QUOTE ] Yes but it wasn't heads up. I'm getting 3-2 on my money. That changes things, surely? [/ QUOTE ] you got lucky that none of those guys had ANY redraw at all. just imagine one of them has top two with his str8 and the other guy has the str8 plus a flush redraw ... all in all, you´re stacking off with nothing but a flush draw. not good omaha, i guess ... take the money, move down and grind it out. otherwise, you´re just a random fish ( w a nice blog [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]) who got lucky. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Do you realise that in hand 1 you can't make a straight if a J comes because you must use two of your hole cards in omaha fishyjimm? [/ QUOTE ] BAN [/ QUOTE ] Why? He's right I think. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
all,
luckyjimm is expert |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Re: +$1800 in 55 hands at $1/$2 - sustainable?
jim, you still have not accepted/rejected my offer to play me heads up.
|
|
|