|
|
#51
10-09-2007, 06:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: CNBC/Wall Street Journal debates at 4:00 PM ET
[ QUOTE ]
I love how they cut Paul off right after his time is up, after allowing everybody else ramble on and on. You're right Dr. Ron, we're not going to support the nominee either unless it's you! [/ QUOTE ] No, that's not true. They started cutting him off when he had 3 seconds left. Unbelievable how unfairly he was treated. Shameeee! Shame I say. I am legitametly angry at CNBC right now. 
|
|
#52
10-09-2007, 06:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CNBC/Wall Street Journal debates at 4:00 PM ET
My favorite part was when the announcer started asking the next question right after Paul was done talking, and then the audience starts applauding for like 10 more seconds. oops.
|
|
#53
10-09-2007, 06:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CNBC/Wall Street Journal debates at 4:00 PM ET
I'm not sure it really matters; the biased treatment is becoming fairly blatant and, therefore, very obvious.
Check out the "who won" poll at www.cnbc.com .
|
|
#54
10-09-2007, 06:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CNBC/Wall Street Journal debates at 4:00 PM ET
youropinion@cnbc.com
To give your opinion of the debate. Complain about the lack of ron paul questions.
|
|
#55
10-09-2007, 06:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CNBC/Wall Street Journal debates at 4:00 PM ET
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The more that I see, the more of a chance I think Paul has. Only because any of the other guys scare the hell out of me. [/ QUOTE ] They have noticed that Ron Paul is very popular and are starting to change their views to mimic his. Paul wants to eliminate the IRS and one of the guys tonight said he would do the same. I think we will continue to see these clowns using Paul's ideas. [/ QUOTE ] Huckabee has been in favor of the Fair Tax all along.
|
|
#56
10-09-2007, 09:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CNBC/Wall Street Journal debates at 4:00 PM ET
The poll at cnbc.com has mysteriously disappeared. Guess who was winning by a landslide?
|
|
#57
10-09-2007, 09:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CNBC/Wall Street Journal debates at 4:00 PM ET
[ QUOTE ]
The poll at cnbc.com has mysteriously disappeared. Guess who was winning by a landslide? [/ QUOTE ] I noticed that too. That is why I refer to CNBC as CNBS. Scumbags.
|
|
#58
10-09-2007, 09:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CNBC/Wall Street Journal debates at 4:00 PM ET
[ QUOTE ]
The poll at cnbc.com has mysteriously disappeared. Guess who was winning by a landslide? [/ QUOTE ] You'd think that'd realize these things get out anyway. When I read it, it was at 80% Ron Paul. Can't have that happening! Of course, the campaign probably gets more usage out of them pulling it than leaving it up anyway.
|
|
#59
10-09-2007, 10:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CNBC/Wall Street Journal debates at 4:00 PM ET
Have people figured out ways to vote a ton for themselves, have people been organizing mass movements on these polls by forums, or are dr ron supports just much more likely to be on the internet?
|
|
#60
10-09-2007, 10:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: CNBC/Wall Street Journal debates at 4:00 PM ET
[ QUOTE ]
Have people figured out ways to vote a ton for themselves, have people been organizing mass movements on these polls by forums, or are dr ron supports just much more likely to be on the internet? [/ QUOTE ] Fox will tell you that it's just a few people jamming the lines/interwebs. After Paul won their own poll a while back, this is what they said. Minutes later there were pictures from all over the country showing the message "Sorry you have already voted in this poll" on their cell phones. Myself, I think that Paul supporters are just more likely to vote in this things. I think that you put out a link to something, and Paul supporters are more likely to click on it, because they know every little bit helps, and they need all the help they can get. That said, I've seen my first 5 presidental signs of the season, and they have ALL been Ron Paul signs, in ALL different parts of town.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
