Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 09-22-2007, 05:01 PM
Triumph36 Triumph36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Osi Ukin\'-yora
Posts: 9,388
Default Re: ratholers unite

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
All this [censored] about stars losing tons of rake if shortstacking was eliminated is simply incorrect. Shortstackers PAY a lot of rake but they don't GENERATE a lot of rake. In general, shortstackers don't start games or keep them going, they join games that are already running and quit if they get short. Remove shortstacking and roughly the same number of games will run, IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

shortstackers keep the games running longer. the fish lose their money slower.

[/ QUOTE ]

not much longer, though. how much would you say people tighten up with your presence? not much imo
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 09-22-2007, 05:02 PM
stinkypete stinkypete is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: lost my luckbox
Posts: 5,723
Default Re: ratholers unite

[ QUOTE ]

not much longer, though. how much would you say people tighten up with your presence? not much imo

[/ QUOTE ]

they tighten up a lot, but that's not the only factor.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 09-22-2007, 05:15 PM
Stinger88 Stinger88 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 828
Default Re: ratholers unite

Shortstackers (and whoever),

I don't know about you but I don't see poker as just a business. I started playing poker because it was fun, not because I saw dollar signs ahead of me. Even now, the money is nice, but definitely not my main motivation for playing. I play for the feeling I get from competition and the fulfillment I get from improving my game and trying to become one of the best.

Do you really want to turn poker into some regular 9-5 grind? With the direction it's going I'm very happy with my decision to keep going to college and get a degree.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 09-22-2007, 05:24 PM
Triumph36 Triumph36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Osi Ukin\'-yora
Posts: 9,388
Default Re: ratholers unite

Stinger:

I am rather surprised at this attitude. Not because it's wrong, but that I thought this attitude had been totally debunked around here. Shortstackers obviously get the least enjoyment out of the game - but they've already assumed that everyone else views the game as a horrible, methodical grind. FWIW, I think most of MSNL sees the game this way.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 09-22-2007, 06:31 PM
ike ike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,130
Default Re: ratholers unite

[ QUOTE ]
Shortstackers (and whoever),

I don't know about you but I don't see poker as just a business. I started playing poker because it was fun, not because I saw dollar signs ahead of me. Even now, the money is nice, but definitely not my main motivation for playing. I play for the feeling I get from competition and the fulfillment I get from improving my game and trying to become one of the best.

Do you really want to turn poker into some regular 9-5 grind? With the direction it's going I'm very happy with my decision to keep going to college and get a degree.

[/ QUOTE ]

poker's fun and all but if it weren't for the money (and the high level of competition that comes with it) it wouldn't be any more appealing than many many other games.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 09-22-2007, 06:43 PM
stinkypete stinkypete is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: lost my luckbox
Posts: 5,723
Default Re: ratholers unite

[ QUOTE ]
Shortstackers (and whoever),

I don't know about you but I don't see poker as just a business. I started playing poker because it was fun, not because I saw dollar signs ahead of me. Even now, the money is nice, but definitely not my main motivation for playing. I play for the feeling I get from competition and the fulfillment I get from improving my game and trying to become one of the best.

Do you really want to turn poker into some regular 9-5 grind? With the direction it's going I'm very happy with my decision to keep going to college and get a degree.

[/ QUOTE ]

i used to play for the same reasons, but i don't have time to play and study poker for fun anymore. the bills need to get paid though. tuition ain't cheap in america.

the last thing i want to do is turn it into a 9-5 grind. that's why i'm in school.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 09-22-2007, 07:18 PM
ImsaKidd ImsaKidd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CHOO CHOO
Posts: 11,074
Default Re: ratholers unite

[ QUOTE ]
Shortstackers (and whoever),

I don't know about you but I don't see poker as just a business. I started playing poker because it was fun, not because I saw dollar signs ahead of me. Even now, the money is nice, but definitely not my main motivation for playing. I play for the feeling I get from competition and the fulfillment I get from improving my game and trying to become one of the best.

Do you really want to turn poker into some regular 9-5 grind? With the direction it's going I'm very happy with my decision to keep going to college and get a degree.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think your attitude is the vast minority tbh.

Not that it is bad, just that money warps things too much.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 09-22-2007, 10:22 PM
cowpig cowpig is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal!
Posts: 1,246
Default Re: ratholers unite

Stinkypete,

I think that your points are pretty valid up to about 2/4 or so on Pokerstars.

Above that level, the majority of players who buy in for less than 50bbs are ratholers, and not fish. The traditional "fish" barely even exists at 10/20+ imo. So the raised min buyin at higher stakes would attract the best kind of people for the HSNL economy: the bad regulars who won't play vs/blame their losses on ratholers.

The kinds of players who have outside sources of income, play a lot of poker, and play stakes that are over their heads are much more valuable than random fish who buy in for a few thousand and lose it once in a while.

The positive effect of having ratholers in the game is very minimal. I actually think that the way ratholers tighten up games considerably (making action junkies unhappy) balances the short term variance they bring. Add the fact that taking ratholers out would encourage bad regulars to play, and I am pretty sure the poker economy would benefit from a 50bb minimum buyin at higher stakes.

-Cowpig
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 09-22-2007, 10:23 PM
SkeetyMcdoogle SkeetyMcdoogle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: sippin goose and chunkin duece
Posts: 1,918
Default Re: ratholers unite

I shortstacked 3/6 the other day with my whole roll and it was fun for what its worth (i lost it all though)
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 09-22-2007, 11:48 PM
BLdSWtTRs BLdSWtTRs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Luck Boxing
Posts: 1,018
Default Re: ratholers unite

If you take away their pf all in play they are done for. Even 25 bb would be a substantial improvement and 30 bb would be HUGE.

After all the emails and complaints nothing has changed so maybe the correct strategy may be to not ask for so much of a change.

50bb wont ever happen imo. I think pushing for 30bb is a better idea.

And all you ratholers are POS for destroying the flow of the game.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.