|
|
#51
09-12-2007, 07:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BAN ON SMOKING
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] And another point, it [censored] amazes me how some of you people can be so ignorant when it comes to the government overstepping their boundaries. As long as its something you approve of, its all ok in your mind. You support a ban on smoking and defend the government's right to do so and then you wonder why the UIGEA exists. [censored] idiots. [/ QUOTE ] YA. RLY. [/ QUOTE ] Q. F. T. 
|
|
#52
09-12-2007, 08:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BAN ON SMOKING
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Welcome to the United Nanny States of America, where your rights don't mean [censored]. Get used to it. You're gonna lose more and more rights as an American/free thinking human. [/ QUOTE ] Whilst im not sold on quite how dangerous passive smoking is, it would be impossible to try and make a case that it is 100% not dangerous. Your 'rights' as a smoker should never infringe on the rights of a non smoker. Im not against smoking, im not even that big on avoiding smokers (my housemate smokes and one of my close friends does too and ive no problem with them smoking when im in the room or anything). But nobody truly chooses to smoke passively when in public, and so i have no problem whatsoever with such a ban. Smoke in your car, smoke in your home. Move house if you cant smoke in your home. Whatever. Banning smoking is 100% right on every level. [/ QUOTE ] The 'rights' of a non smoker should never infringe on the rights of a smoker. There's 2 sides to every coin. [/ QUOTE ] Is there a ban button for those who are stupid?
|
|
#53
09-12-2007, 08:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BAN ON SMOKING
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] And another point, it [censored] amazes me how some of you people can be so ignorant when it comes to the government overstepping their boundaries. As long as its something you approve of, its all ok in your mind. You support a ban on smoking and defend the government's right to do so and then you wonder why the UIGEA exists. [censored] idiots. [/ QUOTE ] YA. RLY. [/ QUOTE ] Q. F. T. [/ QUOTE ] I Like This Game ( And Agree With This Quote ) .
|
|
#54
09-12-2007, 08:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BAN ON SMOKING
I
do this in aim windows all the time just keep hitting enter it's so annoying
|
|
#55
09-12-2007, 08:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BAN ON SMOKING
[ QUOTE ]
And another point, it [censored] amazes me how some of you people can be so ignorant when it comes to the government overstepping their boundaries. As long as its something you approve of, its all ok in your mind. You support a ban on smoking and defend the government's right to do so and then you wonder why the UIGEA exists. [censored] idiots. [/ QUOTE ] ban the gov't plz k thx.
|
|
#56
09-12-2007, 08:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BAN ON SMOKING
[ QUOTE ]
I do this in aim windows all the time just keep hitting enter it's so annoying [/ QUOTE ] I'm twice as good as you . . . D U C Y ?
|
|
#57
09-12-2007, 08:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BAN ON SMOKING
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] And another point, it [censored] amazes me how some of you people can be so ignorant when it comes to the government overstepping their boundaries. As long as its something you approve of, its all ok in your mind. You support a ban on smoking and defend the government's right to do so and then you wonder why the UIGEA exists. [censored] idiots. [/ QUOTE ] ban the gov't plz k thx. [/ QUOTE ] I agree (seriously).
|
|
#58
09-12-2007, 08:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BAN ON SMOKING
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Welcome to the United Nanny States of America, where your rights don't mean [censored]. Get used to it. You're gonna lose more and more rights as an American/free thinking human. [/ QUOTE ] Whilst im not sold on quite how dangerous passive smoking is, it would be impossible to try and make a case that it is 100% not dangerous. Your 'rights' as a smoker should never infringe on the rights of a non smoker. Im not against smoking, im not even that big on avoiding smokers (my housemate smokes and one of my close friends does too and ive no problem with them smoking when im in the room or anything). But nobody truly chooses to smoke passively when in public, and so i have no problem whatsoever with such a ban. Smoke in your car, smoke in your home. Move house if you cant smoke in your home. Whatever. Banning smoking is 100% right on every level. [/ QUOTE ] The 'rights' of a non smoker should never infringe on the rights of a smoker. There's 2 sides to every coin. [/ QUOTE ] Is there a ban button for those who are stupid? [/ QUOTE ] I tried pressing it but you haven't been banned yet.
|
|
#59
09-12-2007, 08:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BAN ON SMOKING
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] And another point, it [censored] amazes me how some of you people can be so ignorant when it comes to the government overstepping their boundaries. As long as its something you approve of, its all ok in your mind. You support a ban on smoking and defend the government's right to do so and then you wonder why the UIGEA exists. [censored] idiots. [/ QUOTE ] ban the gov't plz k thx. [/ QUOTE ] I agree (seriously). [/ QUOTE ] I ain't playin your politics forum reindeer games. That's worse than a rickroll.
|
|
#60
09-12-2007, 08:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BAN ON SMOKING
Does
this make me 3 times better than i was originally?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
