2007-2008 NFL Predictions

[BillNye]

[ QUOTE ]
Indy, New England, and San Diego are the only teams favored to win 10+. If you disagree then go get rich online.

[/ QUOTE ]

Saints arent? bit of a suprise imo.

[BillNye]

[ QUOTE ]
Superbowl: 1995 expansion teams. Panthers over Jacksonville

[/ QUOTE ]

Ya, Jacksonville matches up really well against the Patriots [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

QB: Pats >>>
<font color="green"> RB: Jags &gt;&gt; </font>
WRs: Pats &gt;&gt;&gt;
TE: Pats &gt;&gt;
OL: Pats &gt;&gt;

DE: Pats &gt;&gt;
<font color="green"> DT: Jags &gt;&gt;&gt; </font>
(above is hypothetical cuz 4-3 vs 3-4 is hard to compare)
<font color="green">LB: Jags &gt;</font>
CBs: Pats &gt;
FS: Pats &gt;
SS: Pats &gt;
Coach (most important) Pats &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

[vixticator]

[ QUOTE ]
Offensively I think a strong chance the Bolts will lead the league in scoring. I like what Turner had brought to the offense. More packages more misdirection, its all really confusing to the defense. Rivers more in command in his second year as a starter, Vincent Jackson tore up the Cardinals last night and looks to break out. Total continuity on strong O-Line/Lo Neal, terminology same, LT, Gates, gimme a break.

Defensively, very much a concern. The DB look bad, again. New ILB not that impressive. But outside linebacker, D-line should be spectacular.

11-5 right on the mark. Can rise up and beat anyone in the post season.

[/ QUOTE ]The defense is strong up front, secondary issues can be masked a bit but the unit is stronger than it was a few years ago. Only a few teams can really line up and throw at will against them and running is basically hopeless. Chargers offense is just sick. Rivers is way better than most people know, and most people know he made the pro bowl. They have a number one reciever, his name is Mr. Gates. Jackson/Parker/Osgood/Davis etc just need to do the little that will be asked of them like last year except not drop everything in playoffs. Tomlinson is a monster and so is Turner, even Sproles is a good situational player... o-line prob best in NFL.

But, Norv Turner so obv 7 wins. Riiiiiiiiiiight.

[Vyse]

What kind of idiot goes position-by-position to prove a team is better or matches up better?

[lastchance]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
$20 on each?

I'm taking under 10.5 wins, you're taking over?

[/ QUOTE ]

10+ wins, not 11+ wins. 11+ wins is preposterous and you know that.

[/ QUOTE ]
Which is why I'm making the bet.

I said over 10 wins in my post, not 10+. Yo.

[Vyse]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
$20 on each?

I'm taking under 10.5 wins, you're taking over?

[/ QUOTE ]

10+ wins, not 11+ wins. 11+ wins is preposterous and you know that.

[/ QUOTE ]
Which is why I'm making the bet.

I said over 10 wins in my post, not 10+. Yo.

[/ QUOTE ]

I said 10+ in my post, not over 10. Yo.

[lastchance]

True.

You win at 10 games? Hell no.

[Kos13]

[ QUOTE ]
Coach (most important)

[/ QUOTE ]

Um, no.

[TheNoodleMan]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Superbowl: 1995 expansion teams. Panthers over Jacksonville

[/ QUOTE ]

Ya, Jacksonville matches up really well against the Patriots [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

QB: Pats &gt;&gt;&gt;
<font color="green"> RB: Jags &gt;&gt; </font>
WRs: Pats &gt;&gt;&gt;
TE: Pats &gt;&gt;
OL: Pats &gt;&gt;

DE: Pats &gt;&gt;
<font color="green"> DT: Jags &gt;&gt;&gt; </font>
(above is hypothetical cuz 4-3 vs 3-4 is hard to compare)
<font color="green">LB: Jags &gt;</font>
CBs: Pats &gt;
FS: Pats &gt;
SS: Pats &gt;
Coach (most important) Pats &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;

[/ QUOTE ]

This is pure crap.

At least have the common sense to compare one teams WR to the other teams DBs, etc.

[vixticator]

[ QUOTE ]
Ya, Jacksonville matches up really well against the Patriots [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]Teams do not matchup qb vs qb, o-line vs o-line. At least compare offenses to defenses.