Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 07-18-2007, 07:02 PM
kemystery kemystery is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: leveling you
Posts: 2,045
Default Re: Is Rec.Gambling.Poker still worth reading?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So its glory days were probably the mid-1980s, when it was just Chris Ferguson talking to himself...

[/ QUOTE ]

rgp saw its peak just as the internet was being invented

[/ QUOTE ]


Ferguson was one of the first people in the world to play poker online, in a primitive form. I believe this was in the 1980s. He talked about it in a recent interview, in Cardplayer I think.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't Stop Believing

but the internet wasn't available to the layman until circa 1992.

It's fun to try remembering what other common items were not so common in 1992? Besides cell phones (or even pagers), laptops, PDAs, DVDs, etc etc
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 07-18-2007, 07:14 PM
luckyjimm luckyjimm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: blogging
Posts: 6,106
Default Re: Is Rec.Gambling.Poker still worth reading?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So its glory days were probably the mid-1980s, when it was just Chris Ferguson talking to himself...

[/ QUOTE ]

rgp saw its peak just as the internet was being invented

[/ QUOTE ]


Ferguson was one of the first people in the world to play poker online, in a primitive form. I believe this was in the 1980s. He talked about it in a recent interview, in Cardplayer I think.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't Stop Believing

but the internet wasn't available to the layman until circa 1992.

It's fun to try remembering what other common items were not so common in 1992? Besides cell phones (or even pagers), laptops, PDAs, DVDs, etc etc

[/ QUOTE ]


True - but as a Californian postgrad Ferguson was perfectly located, intellectually as well as geographically, to be a very early adapter. It says here he played IRC poker as far back as 1989:

http://poker.about.com/od/playerprof...isferguson.htm
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 07-18-2007, 07:29 PM
electrickshiite~ electrickshiite~ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: contemplating BBV
Posts: 47
Default Re: Is Rec.Gambling.Poker still worth reading?

[ QUOTE ]
True - but as a Californian postgrad Ferguson was perfectly located, intellectually as well as geographically, to be a very early adapter. It says here he played IRC poker as far back as 1989:

http://poker.about.com/od/playerprof...isferguson.htm

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, and thank you for conceding my point that the very late 80's and early 90's are in fact - not - the mid 80's.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 07-18-2007, 07:32 PM
luckyjimm luckyjimm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: blogging
Posts: 6,106
Default Re: Is Rec.Gambling.Poker still worth reading?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
True - but as a Californian postgrad Ferguson was perfectly located, intellectually as well as geographically, to be a very early adapter. It says here he played IRC poker as far back as 1989:

http://poker.about.com/od/playerprof...isferguson.htm

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, and thank you for conceding my point that the very late 80's and early 90's are in fact - not - the mid 80's.

[/ QUOTE ]

z

z
zz
z

The post of mine you responded to was a quick joke, not an attempt to write a historical record.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 07-18-2007, 10:36 PM
Howard Treesong Howard Treesong is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Theoretically Indeterminable
Posts: 997
Default Re: Is Rec.Gambling.Poker still worth reading?

RGP had some absolutely epic threads in its time, as or better than the best of 2p2. But its unmoderated nature is reflective of the unregulated free market, and it has basically sunk into anarchy. In the days when the number of posters were limited, the quality of discourse was very high -- DN, Abdul Jalib, PaulP, Carson, and even my nemesis William Coleman (who, though crazy, is supersmart and very articulate). Now, it's mostly politics, flaming, spam, and occasional analysis by people who don't know much.

It's frustrating to have watched its decline. Some of the threads (the 44 limit hold 'em thread, the PaulP v. Andrei thread) I can remember from 5+ years ago. And some of the humor at Russ G's expense (PolkaMafia) was hysterically funny. Some of the abuse/gossip threads were quite good as well.

But it's now almost not useful at all. I do miss it.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 07-19-2007, 12:46 AM
Crane Crane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 139
Default Re: Is Rec.Gambling.Poker still worth reading?

I loved RGP. It could be hysterical as well as informative. There weren't thousands and thousands of posts and you could read every post every day.

It was more like a family.

Oh well, rest in peace.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.