some cab driver gossip regarding cloutier/chan

[Fletch46]

Johnny's here in Vancouver for his tournament and everyone in the poker room looks at him like he's god. I haven't seen any bad behaviour from him but when he was here in November for the "Johnny Chan Seminar", well it was just the biggest waste of time. I've already posted about this so I won't go into details. For Johnny's portion of the seminar, he was interviewed by someone and basically said nothing. If he was asked a strategy question he said "we'll talk about that later" but he never did. He just laughed a lot probably at all us fools sitting in the audience, thinking we were going to learn something. What a joke it was.

[PokrLikeItsProse]

[ QUOTE ]
mike sexton stated that chan is the only player he knew that only takes from the game and has never given anything back.


[/ QUOTE ]

Where did he state this?

[88jayhawks]

breitling 1





breitling 2 breitling 3 breitling 4 IWC

[88jayhawks]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
being rich and buying a rolex is such a joke. patek phillippe [censored].

[/ QUOTE ]

can you link a nice patek? i'm looking into getting a nice watch for work and don't want a rollie or a tag...

[/ QUOTE ]

I like this one, but i like the super simple look.

alternate

Any Glashutte watch should be super nice.

im currently sporting this. Yeah its a replica, LDO.

This should do for now.

[/ QUOTE ]

wow...patek's are much much much nicer than tags...tyvm for the links...bustoville coming soon [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

they're also a lot more expensive

[dlpnyc21]

[ QUOTE ]
breitling 1

wow, the IWC one is sooo nice. Unfortunately, I'm not at that "level" yet [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]. Breitlings aren't really good for work, they are too clunky, chunky, and overly flashy, IMO.
Patek's seem to be the happy compromise, I'm looking at those most heavily now...IWC in a few years maybe...



breitling 2 breitling 3 breitling 4 IWC

[/ QUOTE ]

[PITTM]

im gonna go on record as saying that breitlings are totally ugly.

[88jayhawks]

[ QUOTE ]
im gonna go on record as saying that breitlings are totally ugly.

[/ QUOTE ]

its a personal preference i guess, i really like the bentley because it has a big face and looks good on my wrist.

some people like Movado's but they make me puke, so to each his own.

edit: i agree, breitling's are not a watch a you would wear to work unless work is at a poker table or flying a plane

[88jayhawks]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
breitling 1

wow, the IWC one is sooo nice. Unfortunately, I'm not at that "level" yet [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]. Breitlings aren't really good for work, they are too clunky, chunky, and overly flashy, IMO.
Patek's seem to be the happy compromise, I'm looking at those most heavily now...IWC in a few years maybe...



breitling 2 breitling 3 breitling 4 IWC

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

check out the forum shops in vegas, they have a huge watch store with tons a different watches, rolex, breitling, patek's, IWC, tag's and so forth.

i'm sure you could find something you like there

[ispiked]

[ QUOTE ]
im gonna go on record as saying that breitlings are totally ugly.

[/ QUOTE ]
You cannot handle their uber balla-ness.

[PITTM]

yeah, because breitlings are totally more baller than patek philippe or glaushutte somehow right?