Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Business, Finance, and Investing
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 04-14-2007, 05:31 AM
gull gull is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 981
Default Re: How much $ is needed to never have to work again?

[ QUOTE ]
gull,

You are wrong. DUCY?

[/ QUOTE ]

No, I do not see why. Please explain how geometric means are the same as arithmetic means. And please explain how I am wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 04-14-2007, 05:37 AM
kimchi kimchi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: FU minbet
Posts: 1,246
Default Re: How much $ is needed to never have to work again?

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Also, what makes you think 12-15% is a reasonable return to expect? Just curious.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's just over 1% a month. Even in the low volatity environment of the last few years, I've been able to find enough trades to return 1% a month.

[/ QUOTE ]

So what is your trading style? Do you trade long/short? Fundy/TA? long term/short term?

Even a buy & hold index fund would have returned 12-15% over the last 3 to 4 years.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 04-14-2007, 11:35 AM
celiboy celiboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,262
Default Re: How much $ is needed to never have to work again?

A general rule of thumb is that you should have 25X your yearly expenses saved up (so a 4% withdrawal rate). This of course needs to include a provision for taxes. This 25X rule is pretty safe if you retire at the traditional ages of 55+. If you retire younger, then you will need more of course. I would say that if you were 30 right now, you would need over $2 Million
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 04-14-2007, 11:38 AM
celiboy celiboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,262
Default Re: How much $ is needed to never have to work again?

[ QUOTE ]
LOL @ $2k/month.

But setting that aside, back of the envelope calculation:

Inflation-indexed government bonds yield something like 2%. To have $24k/year after taxes, you probably need like $35k/yr income or something. If you want money to gradually increase (in real terms, after expenses/taxes), you need like $40k/yr. At 2%, that means you need $2 million.

[/ QUOTE ]

$2K is reasonable. I track my expenses every few months and I come in around $1650 per month, but my mortgage is only $300. My mtge will be paid off in the next few months, so I'd be looking at $1350 per month in expenses. I live in Canada so I don't have to worry about health care at all and I'm not married or have any kids so obviously that would be higher with either. The key to retiring early is getting your monthly expenses as low as possible...no mortgage, no car or other debt payments ever. Just sock that money away every month in EFT's and low cost mutuals that have outperformed their group average for 15 years or more. Working for the man is [censored] hell and the sooner you retire the better.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 04-14-2007, 12:42 PM
Evan Evan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: startupping
Posts: 14,351
Default Re: How much $ is needed to never have to work again?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
pig4bill, please explain.

[/ QUOTE ]

Explain why I want someone to give me a half-million? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

I feel reasonably confident I can make 12 to 15 percent a year off the market, so I would take 200k and trade my usual way to make my nut. I would keep the other 300k in T-bonds in case the market got really weird or I got too aggressive and lost the stake. If I had to re-load, I would back off the aggression and would only need to make 8% because of the bigger stake. Note that taxes on $24k are nearly non-existant, so a couple percent here or there to cover taxes wouldn't matter to me.

[ QUOTE ]
Question for all:
Is a person who is studying economics or finance of some sort automatically a lot more probably to never have to work again compared to a person who hasn't studied in this field?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. Who's going to be "teaching" you this stuff? Someone that needs a job. How can they teach you something they don't know?

Besides, their institutionalized uncreative thinking is the type that leads them to advise everyone to buy index funds or mutual funds.

[/ QUOTE ]
Taxes on 24k in the US are like 3k, that is hardly nonexistant.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's an extra 1.5% yield on my 200k stake. As I said above, a couple percent here or there doesn't matter to me.

[ QUOTE ]
Also, what makes you think 12-15% is a reasonable return to expect? Just curious.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's just over 1% a month. Even in the low volatity environment of the last few years, I've been able to find enough trades to return 1% a month.

[/ QUOTE ]
Whether or not the taxes "matter" to you isn't really the point, a 1.5% change in return is significant.

The fact that 12-15% is just 1%/month is nice, but doesn't really answer my question.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 04-14-2007, 06:44 PM
Sniper Sniper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Finance Forum
Posts: 12,364
Default Re: How much $ is needed to never have to work again?

What he's saying is 12-15% is reasonable for HIM to achieve... it may or may not be reasonable for someone else with a different level of comfort in using the market to make $$$.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 04-14-2007, 07:22 PM
BradleyT BradleyT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vote Ron Paul 08
Posts: 7,087
Default Re: How much $ is needed to never have to work again?

[ QUOTE ]


so if we assume r is something like 5%, i is close to 3%, and initial year expenses of $24k, your starting endowment should be

a_0 = (24000*1.05)/(.05-.03) = 25200/.02 = $1.26M


edit: note: this assumes a tax-free world, so r should be after-tax return and e_0 should be the amount of pre-tax income one would need to net living expenses in year 0. adjusting the numbers above for an effective tax rate of 30% gives


a_0 = (25200/.7)/(.05*.7-.03) = 36000/.005 = $7.2M

which is a big difference.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is the second formula correct?
Wouldn't it be this?
a_0 = (25200/.7)/(.05-.03)*.7 = 36000/.014 = $2.57M
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 04-14-2007, 08:45 PM
pig4bill pig4bill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,658
Default Re: How much $ is needed to never have to work again?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Also, what makes you think 12-15% is a reasonable return to expect? Just curious.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's just over 1% a month. Even in the low volatity environment of the last few years, I've been able to find enough trades to return 1% a month.

[/ QUOTE ]

So what is your trading style? Do you trade long/short?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah.

[ QUOTE ]
Fundy/TA?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, both.

[ QUOTE ]
long term/short term?

[/ QUOTE ]

Short term. I hate being in anything over a month. Turnover, baby. Get the product in the door and out. That's what got Walmart where it is today.

[ QUOTE ]
Even a buy & hold index fund would have returned 12-15% over the last 3 to 4 years.

[/ QUOTE ]

I can't remember when I last did an index fund trade. Over 10 years ago at least.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 04-14-2007, 08:52 PM
pig4bill pig4bill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,658
Default Re: How much $ is needed to never have to work again?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
pig4bill, please explain.

[/ QUOTE ]

Explain why I want someone to give me a half-million? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

I feel reasonably confident I can make 12 to 15 percent a year off the market, so I would take 200k and trade my usual way to make my nut. I would keep the other 300k in T-bonds in case the market got really weird or I got too aggressive and lost the stake. If I had to re-load, I would back off the aggression and would only need to make 8% because of the bigger stake. Note that taxes on $24k are nearly non-existant, so a couple percent here or there to cover taxes wouldn't matter to me.

[ QUOTE ]
Question for all:
Is a person who is studying economics or finance of some sort automatically a lot more probably to never have to work again compared to a person who hasn't studied in this field?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. Who's going to be "teaching" you this stuff? Someone that needs a job. How can they teach you something they don't know?

Besides, their institutionalized uncreative thinking is the type that leads them to advise everyone to buy index funds or mutual funds.

[/ QUOTE ]
Taxes on 24k in the US are like 3k, that is hardly nonexistant.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's an extra 1.5% yield on my 200k stake. As I said above, a couple percent here or there doesn't matter to me.

[ QUOTE ]
Also, what makes you think 12-15% is a reasonable return to expect? Just curious.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's just over 1% a month. Even in the low volatity environment of the last few years, I've been able to find enough trades to return 1% a month.

[/ QUOTE ]
Whether or not the taxes "matter" to you isn't really the point, a 1.5% change in return is significant.

[/ QUOTE ]

You can keep harping on this like a nit if you want, but the OP's stated goal will be met by 12% return on my initial stake of 200k, so when I said I'm confident of making 12 to 15 percent, taxes are insignificant and irrelevant to the question at hand.

If it makes you any happier, my T-bonds in the backup 300k stake, that I also mentioned in my first post, will be pulling down 5%.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 04-14-2007, 09:43 PM
edtost edtost is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,971
Default Re: How much $ is needed to never have to work again?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


so if we assume r is something like 5%, i is close to 3%, and initial year expenses of $24k, your starting endowment should be

a_0 = (24000*1.05)/(.05-.03) = 25200/.02 = $1.26M


edit: note: this assumes a tax-free world, so r should be after-tax return and e_0 should be the amount of pre-tax income one would need to net living expenses in year 0. adjusting the numbers above for an effective tax rate of 30% gives


a_0 = (25200/.7)/(.05*.7-.03) = 36000/.005 = $7.2M

which is a big difference.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is the second formula correct?
Wouldn't it be this?
a_0 = (25200/.7)/(.05-.03)*.7 = 36000/.014 = $2.57M

[/ QUOTE ]

depends ... i think of inflation as an after-tax return, in which case mine is correct ... if the inflation rate used needed to be adjusted for taxes, yours would be correct.

this does point out how sensitive this model is to your assumptions, though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.