Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 04-12-2007, 02:04 PM
pvn pvn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: back despite popular demand
Posts: 10,955
Default Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws

[ QUOTE ]
Worse than the status quo for some very small percentage of musicians.

[/ QUOTE ]

MY PO-KNEE TWO SLOW
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 04-12-2007, 02:04 PM
Case Closed Case Closed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: just how dangerous is it for a pot to hold ice?
Posts: 7,298
Default Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws

b-dog,

You own me a lot. I have no response.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 04-12-2007, 02:06 PM
TomCollins TomCollins is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Approving of Iron\'s Moderation
Posts: 7,517
Default Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why does everyone not understand this simple concept? An idea is not bound to being in one physical location like a chair is. If I have a chair, it means everyone else does not have that chair. If I have an idea, it DOES NOT mean that I am depriving anyone else of posession of it.

You are confusing scarcity with rareness. An idea might be rare, but this does not mean it is scarce.

[/ QUOTE ]

Okay...so expand outward with this idea, then. Let's say that all IP laws are dissolved. What does the situation look like for, say, a musician?

[/ QUOTE ]

If I have a law that makes me the only person allowed to create software in the world, and that law is abolished, my income is going to drop a lot. Musicians will probably be more focused on performances that cannot be reproduced or companies that produce records will try to make them very hard to copy without permission.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 04-12-2007, 02:10 PM
Coffee Coffee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Waking up
Posts: 2,272
Default Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why does everyone not understand this simple concept? An idea is not bound to being in one physical location like a chair is. If I have a chair, it means everyone else does not have that chair. If I have an idea, it DOES NOT mean that I am depriving anyone else of posession of it.

You are confusing scarcity with rareness. An idea might be rare, but this does not mean it is scarce.

[/ QUOTE ]

Okay...so expand outward with this idea, then. Let's say that all IP laws are dissolved. What does the situation look like for, say, a musician?

[/ QUOTE ]

No different than it does today for 99.9% of musicians who labor creatively with no hope of being compensated for it?

[/ QUOTE ]

So it is better to adversely affect one segment of a group of people and neutrally affect the rest of the group than to at least let some of them benefit?
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 04-12-2007, 02:12 PM
Coffee Coffee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Waking up
Posts: 2,272
Default Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No...but the ability to have those ideas is scarce. Not everyone can make a breakthrough in quantum physics. Not everyone can write "Hey Jude." Not everyone can envision a new cancer treatment. Just because there is no tangible restriction on resources doesn't mean that there isn't a restriction on the ability for people to produce those ideas.

[/ QUOTE ]

And even without IP laws, nobody will be able to steal your "ability to have those ideas". That ability is still scarce, and yours alone.

[/ QUOTE ]

Terrific, as long as I keep them to myself. Unfortunately, if I wanted to, say, get paid for my idea, I'd have to share it with others. However, as soon as I do that, now it's not my idea any more, so how can I demand compensation for it?
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 04-12-2007, 02:14 PM
pvn pvn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: back despite popular demand
Posts: 10,955
Default Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No...but the ability to have those ideas is scarce. Not everyone can make a breakthrough in quantum physics. Not everyone can write "Hey Jude." Not everyone can envision a new cancer treatment. Just because there is no tangible restriction on resources doesn't mean that there isn't a restriction on the ability for people to produce those ideas.

[/ QUOTE ]

And even without IP laws, nobody will be able to steal your "ability to have those ideas". That ability is still scarce, and yours alone.

[/ QUOTE ]

Terrific, as long as I keep them to myself. Unfortunately, if I wanted to, say, get paid for my idea, I'd have to share it with others. However, as soon as I do that, now it's not my idea any more, so how can I demand compensation for it?

[/ QUOTE ]

That's your problem, not mine. Why do you feel you're entitled to compensation?
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 04-12-2007, 02:15 PM
pvn pvn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: back despite popular demand
Posts: 10,955
Default Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws

[ QUOTE ]
So it is better to adversely affect one segment of a group of people and neutrally affect the rest of the group than to at least let some of them benefit?

[/ QUOTE ]

Neutral? Are you sure?
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 04-12-2007, 02:17 PM
Coffee Coffee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Waking up
Posts: 2,272
Default Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No...but the ability to have those ideas is scarce. Not everyone can make a breakthrough in quantum physics. Not everyone can write "Hey Jude." Not everyone can envision a new cancer treatment. Just because there is no tangible restriction on resources doesn't mean that there isn't a restriction on the ability for people to produce those ideas.

[/ QUOTE ]

And even without IP laws, nobody will be able to steal your "ability to have those ideas". That ability is still scarce, and yours alone.

[/ QUOTE ]

Terrific, as long as I keep them to myself. Unfortunately, if I wanted to, say, get paid for my idea, I'd have to share it with others. However, as soon as I do that, now it's not my idea any more, so how can I demand compensation for it?

[/ QUOTE ]

That's your problem, not mine. Why do you feel you're entitled to compensation?

[/ QUOTE ]

Why do you feel you're entitled to compensation for anything you do, either?
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 04-12-2007, 02:18 PM
Coffee Coffee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Waking up
Posts: 2,272
Default Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So it is better to adversely affect one segment of a group of people and neutrally affect the rest of the group than to at least let some of them benefit?

[/ QUOTE ]

Neutral? Are you sure?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm going off the model I was given. I have yet to hear how this benefits musicians on the whole.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 04-12-2007, 02:25 PM
pvn pvn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: back despite popular demand
Posts: 10,955
Default Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So it is better to adversely affect one segment of a group of people and neutrally affect the rest of the group than to at least let some of them benefit?

[/ QUOTE ]

Neutral? Are you sure?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm going off the model I was given. I have yet to hear how this benefits musicians on the whole.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh, by "rest of the group" I thought you meant everyone, not just musicians. So why do you ignore the effects on everyone else?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.