#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws
[ QUOTE ]
Worse than the status quo for some very small percentage of musicians. [/ QUOTE ] MY PO-KNEE TWO SLOW |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws
b-dog,
You own me a lot. I have no response. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Why does everyone not understand this simple concept? An idea is not bound to being in one physical location like a chair is. If I have a chair, it means everyone else does not have that chair. If I have an idea, it DOES NOT mean that I am depriving anyone else of posession of it. You are confusing scarcity with rareness. An idea might be rare, but this does not mean it is scarce. [/ QUOTE ] Okay...so expand outward with this idea, then. Let's say that all IP laws are dissolved. What does the situation look like for, say, a musician? [/ QUOTE ] If I have a law that makes me the only person allowed to create software in the world, and that law is abolished, my income is going to drop a lot. Musicians will probably be more focused on performances that cannot be reproduced or companies that produce records will try to make them very hard to copy without permission. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Why does everyone not understand this simple concept? An idea is not bound to being in one physical location like a chair is. If I have a chair, it means everyone else does not have that chair. If I have an idea, it DOES NOT mean that I am depriving anyone else of posession of it. You are confusing scarcity with rareness. An idea might be rare, but this does not mean it is scarce. [/ QUOTE ] Okay...so expand outward with this idea, then. Let's say that all IP laws are dissolved. What does the situation look like for, say, a musician? [/ QUOTE ] No different than it does today for 99.9% of musicians who labor creatively with no hope of being compensated for it? [/ QUOTE ] So it is better to adversely affect one segment of a group of people and neutrally affect the rest of the group than to at least let some of them benefit? |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] No...but the ability to have those ideas is scarce. Not everyone can make a breakthrough in quantum physics. Not everyone can write "Hey Jude." Not everyone can envision a new cancer treatment. Just because there is no tangible restriction on resources doesn't mean that there isn't a restriction on the ability for people to produce those ideas. [/ QUOTE ] And even without IP laws, nobody will be able to steal your "ability to have those ideas". That ability is still scarce, and yours alone. [/ QUOTE ] Terrific, as long as I keep them to myself. Unfortunately, if I wanted to, say, get paid for my idea, I'd have to share it with others. However, as soon as I do that, now it's not my idea any more, so how can I demand compensation for it? |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] No...but the ability to have those ideas is scarce. Not everyone can make a breakthrough in quantum physics. Not everyone can write "Hey Jude." Not everyone can envision a new cancer treatment. Just because there is no tangible restriction on resources doesn't mean that there isn't a restriction on the ability for people to produce those ideas. [/ QUOTE ] And even without IP laws, nobody will be able to steal your "ability to have those ideas". That ability is still scarce, and yours alone. [/ QUOTE ] Terrific, as long as I keep them to myself. Unfortunately, if I wanted to, say, get paid for my idea, I'd have to share it with others. However, as soon as I do that, now it's not my idea any more, so how can I demand compensation for it? [/ QUOTE ] That's your problem, not mine. Why do you feel you're entitled to compensation? |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws
[ QUOTE ]
So it is better to adversely affect one segment of a group of people and neutrally affect the rest of the group than to at least let some of them benefit? [/ QUOTE ] Neutral? Are you sure? |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] No...but the ability to have those ideas is scarce. Not everyone can make a breakthrough in quantum physics. Not everyone can write "Hey Jude." Not everyone can envision a new cancer treatment. Just because there is no tangible restriction on resources doesn't mean that there isn't a restriction on the ability for people to produce those ideas. [/ QUOTE ] And even without IP laws, nobody will be able to steal your "ability to have those ideas". That ability is still scarce, and yours alone. [/ QUOTE ] Terrific, as long as I keep them to myself. Unfortunately, if I wanted to, say, get paid for my idea, I'd have to share it with others. However, as soon as I do that, now it's not my idea any more, so how can I demand compensation for it? [/ QUOTE ] That's your problem, not mine. Why do you feel you're entitled to compensation? [/ QUOTE ] Why do you feel you're entitled to compensation for anything you do, either? |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] So it is better to adversely affect one segment of a group of people and neutrally affect the rest of the group than to at least let some of them benefit? [/ QUOTE ] Neutral? Are you sure? [/ QUOTE ] I'm going off the model I was given. I have yet to hear how this benefits musicians on the whole. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] So it is better to adversely affect one segment of a group of people and neutrally affect the rest of the group than to at least let some of them benefit? [/ QUOTE ] Neutral? Are you sure? [/ QUOTE ] I'm going off the model I was given. I have yet to hear how this benefits musicians on the whole. [/ QUOTE ] Oh, by "rest of the group" I thought you meant everyone, not just musicians. So why do you ignore the effects on everyone else? |
|
|