|
|
#51
01-28-2007, 11:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I folded quads today
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] hey philosophy major, scenarios like this are actually something i've been thinking about lately. on one hand, i feel that the universe would've reacted differently if you'd called or gone all-in, that there's some kind of quantum-physical indeterminacy even to a shuffled deck and you wouldn't (necessarily) have made quads, but the other side of the argument is that the deck was already established, so your action could not have affected it. what's your serious opinion on this? [/ QUOTE ] what the [censored] just happened [/ QUOTE ] I thoroughly enjoy a good philosophy discussion, or a good article on the topic. That being said, this has to be the dumbest [censored] Ive ever read. 
|
|
#52
01-28-2007, 01:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I folded quads today
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] hey philosophy major, scenarios like this are actually something i've been thinking about lately. on one hand, i feel that the universe would've reacted differently if you'd called or gone all-in, that there's some kind of quantum-physical indeterminacy even to a shuffled deck and you wouldn't (necessarily) have made quads, but the other side of the argument is that the deck was already established, so your action could not have affected it. what's your serious opinion on this? [/ QUOTE ] what the [censored] just happened [/ QUOTE ] I thoroughly enjoy a good philosophy discussion, or a good article on the topic. That being said, this has to be the dumbest [censored] Ive ever read. [/ QUOTE ] in mike's defense he's just making fun of me because i talk about chaos theory a lot. he doesn't actually think the deck changes.
|
|
#53
01-28-2007, 09:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I folded quads today
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] hey philosophy major, scenarios like this are actually something i've been thinking about lately. on one hand, i feel that the universe would've reacted differently if you'd called or gone all-in, that there's some kind of quantum-physical indeterminacy even to a shuffled deck and you wouldn't (necessarily) have made quads, but the other side of the argument is that the deck was already established, so your action could not have affected it. what's your serious opinion on this? [/ QUOTE ] what the [censored] just happened [/ QUOTE ] I thoroughly enjoy a good philosophy discussion, or a good article on the topic. That being said, this has to be the dumbest [censored] Ive ever read. [/ QUOTE ] in mike's defense he's just making fun of me because i talk about chaos theory a lot. he doesn't actually think the deck changes. [/ QUOTE ] schrodinger's cat yo. the cat is either alive or dead, it's like the established deck, but until the box is opened and we make the observation, the cat is both alive AND dead according to quantum physics. no?
|
|
#54
01-28-2007, 09:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I folded quads today
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] hey philosophy major, scenarios like this are actually something i've been thinking about lately. on one hand, i feel that the universe would've reacted differently if you'd called or gone all-in, that there's some kind of quantum-physical indeterminacy even to a shuffled deck and you wouldn't (necessarily) have made quads, but the other side of the argument is that the deck was already established, so your action could not have affected it. what's your serious opinion on this? [/ QUOTE ] what the [censored] just happened [/ QUOTE ] I thoroughly enjoy a good philosophy discussion, or a good article on the topic. That being said, this has to be the dumbest [censored] Ive ever read. [/ QUOTE ] in mike's defense he's just making fun of me because i talk about chaos theory a lot. he doesn't actually think the deck changes. [/ QUOTE ] schrodinger's cat yo. the cat is either alive or dead, it's like the established deck, but until the box is opened and we make the observation, the cat is both alive AND dead according to quantum physics. no? [/ QUOTE ] not if the box has no holes for ventialation and the cat's been in it for any serious length of time
|
|
#55
01-28-2007, 11:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I folded quads today
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] hey philosophy major, scenarios like this are actually something i've been thinking about lately. on one hand, i feel that the universe would've reacted differently if you'd called or gone all-in, that there's some kind of quantum-physical indeterminacy even to a shuffled deck and you wouldn't (necessarily) have made quads, but the other side of the argument is that the deck was already established, so your action could not have affected it. what's your serious opinion on this? [/ QUOTE ] what the [censored] just happened [/ QUOTE ] I thoroughly enjoy a good philosophy discussion, or a good article on the topic. That being said, this has to be the dumbest [censored] Ive ever read. [/ QUOTE ] in mike's defense he's just making fun of me because i talk about chaos theory a lot. he doesn't actually think the deck changes. [/ QUOTE ] schrodinger's cat yo. the cat is either alive or dead, it's like the established deck, but until the box is opened and we make the observation, the cat is both alive AND dead according to quantum physics. no? [/ QUOTE ] Should I be proud or scared that I immediately thought of Schrodinger's cat, as well?
|
|
#56
01-28-2007, 11:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I folded quads today
[ QUOTE ]
HAHAH GOD PUNISHED YOU FOR LAYING DOWN AA. Foxwoodfiends: God damnit he has a set I have to fold my AA. PokerGod: WHO THE [censored] DO YOU THINK YOU ARE? NO ONE IS GOOD ENOUGH TO FOLD AA. *Pokergod ships running quads* Foxwoodfiend: Goddamn my hubris. [/ QUOTE ] holy [censored] good2cu used hubris in a sentence
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
