#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Korea vs Switzerland Thread***
What a total shambles.
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Korea vs Switzerland Thread***
WTF ref? LOL the linesman clearly raised his flag, but the ref simply followed the play. You then see him turn to look towards the linesman and he slips at the crucial moment and awards the goal anyway. You couldn't make it up! [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Korea vs Switzerland Thread***
Yeah so [censored] this match then I'm thinking In-n-Out
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Korea vs Switzerland Thread***
There's no [censored] way in hell that goal should stand.
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Korea vs Switzerland Thread***
the commentary I have said that, since the ball was touched by the korean, the offside shouldn't have been called, and that the referee was correct
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Korea vs Switzerland Thread***
omg rigged
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Korea vs Switzerland Thread***
The asst. ref's flag went up though. Is the play dead retroactive to when the flag goes up, or does the head ref have to acknowledge it?
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Korea vs Switzerland Thread***
don't worry Koreans, you aren't going to score anyway.
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Korea vs Switzerland Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
the commentary I have said that, since the ball was touched by the korean, the offside shouldn't have been called, and that the referee was correct [/ QUOTE ] I thought it had to be played by a defender, not just touched. A deflection is a touch. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Korea vs Switzerland Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
the commentary I have said that, since the ball was touched by the korean, the offside shouldn't have been called, and that the referee was correct [/ QUOTE ] This is incorrect. The ball has to be 'played' by the Korean for that to be correct, touching him doesn't matter. If you believe that the guy played it back, which it seems the ref did, then it should have been allowed. Personally I think it was just a deflection so it should have been called off. |
|
|