#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a hand vs PA, 200/400 HU
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i would raise the turn and my reasoning is that it feels like he's strong, and you still beat most of the hands in his "strong" range. given yet another giant bet on the river, i think his range tightens up even further to one that now has your hand beat, so i would fold. [/ QUOTE ] see, i think krantz made it soundl ike his river betting range > turn calling (or shoving) range. i also think calling gives us a good chance to look like we have two queens or two nines, where raising the turn over reps our hand in some regards. krantz def didn't say taht he had been bluff raising often or anything. still, i have nooo problem raising hte turn, i'm just trying to say why i think it's bad in this situation with described history. i still thin kit's fine and would do it some % of the time, maybe like half. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, only way raising turn gets more value is since its deep and PA will make a thin semibluff 3-bet shove with a lone club + high card etc. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a hand vs PA, 200/400 HU
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i would raise the turn and my reasoning is that it feels like he's strong, and you still beat most of the hands in his "strong" range. given yet another giant bet on the river, i think his range tightens up even further to one that now has your hand beat, so i would fold. [/ QUOTE ] see, i think krantz made it soundl ike his river betting range > turn calling (or shoving) range. i also think calling gives us a good chance to look like we have two queens or two nines, where raising the turn over reps our hand in some regards. krantz def didn't say taht he had been bluff raising often or anything. still, i have nooo problem raising hte turn, i'm just trying to say why i think it's bad in this situation with described history. i still thin kit's fine and would do it some % of the time, maybe like half. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, only way raising turn gets more value is since its deep and PA will make a thin semibluff 3-bet shove with a lone club + high card etc. [/ QUOTE ] Or when we don't incorrectly fold to a 6 river, 4 river, [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] river, etc Or when he calls a turn raise and folds to a river bet with a hand that isn't putting money in on the river UI, etc |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a hand vs PA, 200/400 HU
that is such a big flop raise i am having trouble figuring out what it means.
i would play the same and fold here. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a hand vs PA, 200/400 HU
[ QUOTE ]
that is such a big flop raise i am having trouble figuring out what it means. [/ QUOTE ] What you mean big, it's <pot (assuming krantz opened to 3bb). |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a hand vs PA, 200/400 HU
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] that is such a big flop raise i am having trouble figuring out what it means. [/ QUOTE ] What you mean big, it's <pot (assuming krantz opened to 3bb). [/ QUOTE ] its much larger than normal for HU matches. most people just go 3x or something slightly higher. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a hand vs PA, 200/400 HU
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] that is such a big flop raise i am having trouble figuring out what it means. [/ QUOTE ] What you mean big, it's <pot (assuming krantz opened to 3bb). [/ QUOTE ] its much larger than normal for HU matches. most people just go 3x or something slightly higher. [/ QUOTE ] is PA most ppl? I would stay away from making a big read on him pot raising a flop... |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a hand vs PA, 200/400 HU
result?
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a hand vs PA, 200/400 HU
[ QUOTE ]
result? [/ QUOTE ] no not yet |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a hand vs PA, 200/400 HU
its over pot on flop i think.
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Re: a hand vs PA, 200/400 HU
100 less than pot. deeper stacked its probably his standard size anyways.
|
|
|