Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 06-08-2007, 05:01 PM
goofyballer goofyballer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: THESE IZ THE OLD FORUMZ
Posts: 7,108
Default Re: 1.6k pot at 200NL - Stars is rigged, obviously

LOL CARROTSNAKE UR SUCH A NIT I BET U DONT WIN AT POKER DO U
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 06-08-2007, 05:02 PM
Big_Jim Big_Jim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BEHIND YOU
Posts: 12,323
Default Re: 1.6k pot at 200NL - Stars is rigged, obviously

[ QUOTE ]
you are all retarded. Players who are directly involved in the hand can say whatever the [censored] they want.

[/ QUOTE ]
NO, POT! YOU ARE THE ONE THAT IS BLACK!
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 06-08-2007, 05:04 PM
BowToYourSensei BowToYourSensei is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: backpedaling (for the moment)
Posts: 7,261
Default Re: 1.6k pot at 200NL - Stars is rigged, obviously

SHAMPOO IS BETTER! I GO ON THE HAIR FIRST!
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 06-08-2007, 05:05 PM
BowToYourSensei BowToYourSensei is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: backpedaling (for the moment)
Posts: 7,261
Default Re: 1.6k pot at 200NL - Stars is rigged, obviously

[ QUOTE ]


[/ QUOTE ]

hilarious
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 06-08-2007, 05:15 PM
aislephive aislephive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: And now the children are asleep
Posts: 6,874
Default Re: 1.6k pot at 200NL - Stars is rigged, obviously

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


[/ QUOTE ]

hilarious

[/ QUOTE ]

God I just watched that whole thing .. I want to die now.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 06-08-2007, 05:17 PM
MYNAMEIZGREG MYNAMEIZGREG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: LeggoPoker
Posts: 2,022
Default Re: 1.6k pot at 200NL - Stars is rigged, obviously

So, folding 87d here is a mistake.

Then shouldn't we me appaulding OP for saying I have the nuts when it will only make the other guy fold a FD, and he will prob call with 66 anyway...

Basically, how is this different than live talking to your guy. Becuase it's multiway? It was HU at that point?
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 06-08-2007, 05:24 PM
Big_Jim Big_Jim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BEHIND YOU
Posts: 12,323
Default Re: 1.6k pot at 200NL - Stars is rigged, obviously

[ QUOTE ]
Becuase it's multiway?

[/ QUOTE ]
Yes.

[ QUOTE ]
It was HU at that point?

[/ QUOTE ]
No it wasn't.

What if one of the other villains had the nut flush draw? At this point in the hand, the more callers the better, for them.

EDIT: Well, unless he actually knew he had 78d
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 06-08-2007, 05:32 PM
Imrahil Imrahil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 7,500
Default Re: 1.6k pot at 200NL - Stars is rigged, obviously

I like betgo calling Carrot snake a nit ahahahaha. But I'm sorta confused why he folded when $400 isn't anything to him. I can imagine hime saying GAMBOOOOOL (if he thought that he should fold).
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 06-08-2007, 06:38 PM
futuredoc85 futuredoc85 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 9,014
Default Re: 1.6k pot at 200NL - Stars is rigged, obviously

[ QUOTE ]

I like betgo calling Carrot snake a nit ahahahaha. But I'm sorta confused why he folded when $400 isn't anything to him. I can imagine hime saying GAMBOOOOOL (if he thought that he should fold).

[/ QUOTE ]

the fact that he doesnt say gambool when he thinks he should fold is the reason $400 isnt anything to him.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 06-08-2007, 07:28 PM
bottomset bottomset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: middleset ftw
Posts: 12,983
Default Re: 1.6k pot at 200NL - Stars is rigged, obviously

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you are all retarded. Players who are directly involved in the hand can say whatever the [censored] they want.

[/ QUOTE ]


"8. In both cash games and tournaments, if there are more than two players left in a pot, players (in the hand or not) may not chat anything that might reasonably be interpreted as affecting the play of the hand. For instance, suppose players A, B, and C are in a hand. A bets, and B is next to act. C may not chat, "I'm going to fold" (whether he intends to fold or not)."

http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/room/policies/

[/ QUOTE ]

lol owned
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.