#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phil Ivey too busto for Whitelime??
[ QUOTE ]
"Go wake up Emil, go wake up Emil, go wake up Emil." [/ QUOTE ] |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phil Ivey too busto for Whitelime?? *DELETED*
Post deleted by Dids
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phil Ivey too busto for Whitelime??
I'm still trying to figure out why it matters whether or not he's really risking 83k to win 16k. Ivey is like a 100-1 dog to beat the world's greatest player anyways, right? I would risk 83 to win 16 with those odds.
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phil Ivey too busto for Whitelime??
Full Tilt Poker Game #2956886996: Table Canfield (6 max) - $200/$400 - No Limit Hold'em - 18:10:49 ET - 2007/07/15
Seat 1: sbrugby ($40,399) Seat 3: whitelime ($177,928) Seat 6: Phil Ivey ($43,395) sbrugby posts the small blind of $200 whitelime posts the big blind of $400 The button is in seat #6 *** HOLE CARDS *** Phil Ivey raises to $1,200 sbrugby folds whitelime calls $800 *** FLOP *** [4c 2c 4h] whitelime checks Phil Ivey has 15 seconds left to act Phil Ivey bets $2,000 whitelime raises to $4,000 Phil Ivey calls $2,000 *** TURN *** [4c 2c 4h] [Qc] whitelime checks Phil Ivey bets $8,400 whitelime calls $8,400 *** RIVER *** [4c 2c 4h Qc] [Jc] whitelime checks Phil Ivey has 15 seconds left to act Phil Ivey bets $29,795, and is all in whitelime has 15 seconds left to act whitelime has requested TIME whitelime calls $29,795 *** SHOW DOWN *** Phil Ivey shows [9s 7s] a pair of Fours whitelime shows [9c 9d] a flush, Queen high whitelime wins the pot ($86,989) with a flush, Queen high Phil Ivey is sitting out *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $86,990 | Rake $1 Board: [4c 2c 4h Qc Jc] Seat 1: sbrugby (small blind) folded before the Flop Seat 3: whitelime (big blind) showed [9c 9d] and won ($86,989) with a flush, Queen high Seat 6: Phil Ivey (button) showed [9s 7s] and lost with a pair of Fours Then he leaves |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phil Ivey too busto for Whitelime??
So... Dean hates Phil Ivey or just likes posting his hand histories. Cool.
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phil Ivey too busto for Whitelime??
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think many people will interpret this the wrong way because maybe they think Dean is staying with you/sweating you and made this post as a "haha we rule ivey drools" sort of way. [/ QUOTE ] qft. [/ QUOTE ] I agree with this and don't think whitelime is doing anything unethical. I also think it's ridiculous that the same guys who go on and on about how the shortstackers are so unethical/min buy-in needs to be raised have no problem with the fact that whitelime only gives action ~100bb deep but not much shorter or deeper. Yeah hu is different than 6 or 10 handed but in my eyes these two things are very similar. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phil Ivey too busto for Whitelime??
After whitelime sat out and asked him to reload Phil did after a couple of minutes. They played 4 or 5 more hands than Phil left both tables they were on.
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phil Ivey too busto for Whitelime??
the only highstakes player that plays shorter sessions than Ivey is Ozzy
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phil Ivey too busto for Whitelime??
wl,
My apologies. I just assumed that all of you guys were posting together or at least aware of what the guys you were hanging with were posting about each other. Apparently that seems not to be the case and it's just that Dean is sort of a little bitch. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Phil Ivey too busto for Whitelime??
[ QUOTE ]
Apparently that seems not to be the case and it's just that Dean is sort of a little bitch. [/ QUOTE ] Dean can be happy to know that he is only 50% bitch. Guesses on what makes up the other 50% of Dean? I would guess money. |
|
|