#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: outing lent53
[ QUOTE ]
i guess one hh isn't inconclusive proof to prove he was cheating, but geez lol @ all the posts defending him adamantly. If you are going to say there is no conclusive evidence he was cheating and that we're all witchunting over here, then there is DEFINITELY no evidence that he is completely innocent. That is just insanely naive. On paper, this looks blatant and awful because it's really a genuine tough spot. [/ QUOTE ] Are you on crack? |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: outing lent53
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I would never even CONSIDER calling a bet like that on the river. [/ QUOTE ] so he plays bad too? [/ QUOTE ] that isn't fair. there's plenty of guys i would auto fold to in this situation. furthermore, i would also argue that you could auto fold whenever anyone shoves 2x+PSB (without the nuts) on the river and still be a huge winner in that game, so long as others don't know this. tc edit: that being said, i think not considering calling bets of this nature is a leak, but seriously, everyone on this message board has leaks and we aren't all bad players. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: outing lent53
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I would never even CONSIDER calling a bet like that on the river. [/ QUOTE ] so he plays bad too? [/ QUOTE ] this is a call vs me tbh. esp at 4am after i burn thru a couple buyins. ive bluffed off far more money, in far worse spots, many times. im pretty sure anyone thats played with me on ub can vouch that i can be a loose cannon. while i may be deadmoney, i sure as hell aint scared money, and thats why this is so egregious. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: outing lent53
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I would never even CONSIDER calling a bet like that on the river. [/ QUOTE ] so he plays bad too? [/ QUOTE ] he's probably just still a nit, like he used to be |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: outing lent53
i think whether he was cheating or not, dude what the [censored] if you are going to play 25/50, its obvious that you are balling enough to afford reasonable internet for [censored] sake.
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: outing lent53
Victor,
pretty obvious why you are a losing player. Good luck with life |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: outing lent53
[ QUOTE ]
Victor, pretty obvious why you are a losing player. Good luck with life [/ QUOTE ] im not a losing player. mebbe in that particular game. but overall, id bet my life im a winning player. and at some point i will beat that game. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: outing lent53
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Victor, pretty obvious why you are a losing player. Good luck with life [/ QUOTE ] im not a losing player. mebbe in that particular game. but overall, id bet my life im a winning player. and at some point i will beat that game. [/ QUOTE ] how do you have 11k posts, and write a post like this? |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Re: outing lent53
dunno, its just a figure of speech. ya know, like im positive im a winning player. does that sound better to you?
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Re: outing lent53
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] That guy has a loooooooooong history of that. Pretty outrageous UB hasn't banned him. [/ QUOTE ] Can you please post some HHs that verify his long history of abusing DP protection. [/ QUOTE ] I have to admit that comment was very irresponsible. I haven't played UB in like 7 months and not heavily for much longer than that. There was a regular there who used to frequently abuse all-in in NLHE and I think the 3-6 LHE too, and when I read OP I thought it was lent53. It was some reg with a generic name like that. But tbh I don't remember for sure. The fact that nobody is corroborating makes me think it was someone else. I'll go through my chat logs later to figure out who it was. [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] On another note thinking JJ is an instafold there is way exploitable FWIW. |
|
|