![]() |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
no @ ur second graph
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
your second graph makes no sense to me. The other two are reasonable. I would mark either one correct if I was the prof.
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the professor's answer can't possibly be right. limesparks picture above was the best answer. Boom's first answer also works. 2nd answer doesn't.
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
PV = nRT P = nRT/V nRT are constant so P is inversely related to V. Linearly related. So as V gets bigger, P gets smaller and vice versa. They gave away the answer in the first sentence. Except for the linear part. WTF? [/ QUOTE ] DBZ talkin about math is so hawt- also ... i have a headache from tryin to comprehend your professors graph |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
does the axis necessarily mean zero?
for the first one i guess your explanation is fine but ur not including part so i could see why he could mark it wrong. sometimes nitty [censored] like that is important. imo open circles on the axes would be best. yeah and 2nd is ldo wrong |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
does the axis necessarily mean zero? for the first one i guess your explanation is fine but ur not including part so i could see why he could mark it wrong. sometimes nitty [censored] like that is important. imo open circles on the axes would be best. yeah and 2nd is ldo wrong [/ QUOTE ] Axis doesn't have to be 0, but without denoting it otherwise then yes it should be 0. Boost > both you and teacher fail at math. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
lolololol @ graph 2
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[edit]Oh I grunched. Second graph is for crackheads, but 'A for effort' since the earlier (CORRECT) answer was marked off. Please elaborate prof's justification fro his being right, and your graph #1 being wrong.
PS Asymptotes make earlier graph more accurate than mine, but that describes actual relationship between P and V, not the Ideal Gas Law model.[/edit] grunch: Geebus, this is simple Ideal Gas Law (PV=nRT). The term nRT remains constant. So as P increases, V decreases; as P decreases, V increases. Inverse proportional relationship. P EQUALS K TIMES INVERSE V. ![]() |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[edit]Oh I grunched. Second graph is for crackheads, but 'A for effort' since the earlier (CORRECT) answer was marked off. Please elaborate prof's justification fro his being right, and your graph #1 being wrong. PS Asymptotes make earlier graph more accurate than mine, but that describes actual relationship between P and V, not the Ideal Gas Law model.[/edit] grunch: Geebus, this is simple Ideal Gas Law (PV=nRT). The term nRT remains constant. So as P increases, V decreases; as P decreases, V increases. Inverse proportional relationship. P EQUALS K TIMES INVERSE V. ![]() [/ QUOTE ] dude, if nRT is a constant k, then V = k/P. graph this on ur calculator its not a straight line i swear make ur graph log V vs. log P and then we got a deal |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
limesparks is right imo
|
![]() |
|
|