|
|
#53
10-24-2007, 06:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AP infinity plus one - New AP Statement
Gary there is no need to "sign" all of your posts. With today's modern technology members names and avatars appear to the immediate left of all of their posts. Not only are signatures redundant, but in your case they are also confusing as "gg" is commonly used as a short form for "good game".
|
|
#54
10-24-2007, 06:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP infinity plus one - New AP Statement
[ QUOTE ]
Gary there is no need to "sign" all of your posts. With today's modern technology members names and avatars appear to the immediate left of all of their posts. Not only are signatures redundant, but in your case they are also confusing as "gg" is commonly used as a short form for "good game". [/ QUOTE ] Thanks gg
|
|
#55
10-24-2007, 06:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: New AP Statement
[ QUOTE ]
has anybody emailed the KGC yet and discussed possible penalties for AP's involvement in trying to cover up for the consultant .. ... [/ QUOTE ] But doesn't the KGC own AP?
|
|
#56
10-24-2007, 06:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: New AP Statement
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] has anybody emailed the KGC yet and discussed possible penalties for AP's involvement in trying to cover up for the consultant .. ... [/ QUOTE ] But doesn't the KGC own AP? [/ QUOTE ] would be interesting to see what their response would be ...
|
|
#57
10-24-2007, 06:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP infinity plus one - New AP Statement
This statement says absolutely nothing new. They are trying to wait us out. I'm a pretty forgiving guy and it's starting to work on me. [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] Please to see new dramabomb?
|
|
#58
10-24-2007, 06:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP infinity plus one - New AP Statement
[ QUOTE ]
5. The suspected period of time of the security breach has been identified. This period is recent and confined to a relatively brief period. The actual dates will be publicly released upon confirmation by the third party auditor. [/ QUOTE ] Anybody out there actually believe this statement?(Ikestoys excluded)
|
|
#59
10-24-2007, 06:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP infinity plus one - New AP Statement
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 5. The suspected period of time of the security breach has been identified. This period is recent and confined to a relatively brief period. The actual dates will be publicly released upon confirmation by the third party auditor. [/ QUOTE ] Anybody out there actually believe this statement?(Ikestoys excluded) [/ QUOTE ] leaning that way 1)90% sure the 7 mil article is just weird BS 2)not one person has ever sent me a single hand history prior to mid-August involving a clear superuser
|
|
#60
10-24-2007, 06:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP infinity plus one - New AP Statement
Adanthar,
Im curious about the time period between the cash games with doubledrag and the tournament with potripper. Wasnt that a few months or so?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
