Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:49 PM
ryanghall ryanghall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,789
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

Again, it's not his range that's relevant. It's the fact that 7 people are left to act behind me and I obviously can't call an allin w/ AQ, 99
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:53 PM
suzzer99 suzzer99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: guuhhhn inner nets
Posts: 13,634
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

But would you fold those hands if UTG hadn't bet? If not, then why fold to a raise you know is mega-wide with 285 chips for the taking? As I think Roland said in his post, starting out at 1100 chips is not the end of the world. I do it all the time.

Edit: Oh hey this was my 4000th post. Tra la la la boom-dee-ayyy. Cue the elephants.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:56 PM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Black Kelly Holcomb
Posts: 13,713
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

[ QUOTE ]
Again, it's not his range that's relevant. It's the fact that 7 people are left to act behind me and I obviously can't call an allin w/ AQ, 99

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you calling with AK, and TT?
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:58 PM
ryanghall ryanghall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,789
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

I'm raising with AK.

TT is a tough one.

Suzzer you're comparing apples to oranges. Of course I'm not folding those hands for a minimal amount of chips.

Things change when there's almost 300 chips in the pot right off the bat. People will go for them.

Ryan
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 04-17-2006, 05:04 PM
The Venetian The Venetian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Gettin\' my sillies out.
Posts: 502
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

[ QUOTE ]
But would you fold those hands if UTG hadn't bet? If not, then why fold to a raise you know is mega-wide with 285 chips for the taking? As I think Roland said in his post, starting out at 1100 chips is not the end of the world. I do it all the time.

Edit: Oh hey this was my 4000th post. Tra la la la boom-dee-ayyy. Cue the elephants.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course not, but there's a big difference between putting 300 chips and 60-90 chips into the pot preflop when you're way out of position. I agree his range is probably wider than normal for UTG, but I really don't like the idea of putting 300 chips out with the distinct possibility I won't even see a flop. Situations vs. cards.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 04-17-2006, 05:05 PM
suzzer99 suzzer99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: guuhhhn inner nets
Posts: 13,634
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

[ QUOTE ]
Suzzer you're comparing apples to oranges. Of course I'm not folding those hands for a minimal amount of chips.

Things change when there's almost 300 chips in the pot right off the bat. People will go for them.

Ryan

[/ QUOTE ]

There's something paradoxical about this line of thinking that I can't quite put my finger on. You're saying that you would raise AQ to pick up 45 chips. But you would pass on the chance to pick up 300, because someone might come over the top with a worse hand and you'd have to fold? Something just doesn't feel right about that logic to me.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 04-17-2006, 05:06 PM
suzzer99 suzzer99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: guuhhhn inner nets
Posts: 13,634
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But would you fold those hands if UTG hadn't bet? If not, then why fold to a raise you know is mega-wide with 285 chips for the taking? As I think Roland said in his post, starting out at 1100 chips is not the end of the world. I do it all the time.

Edit: Oh hey this was my 4000th post. Tra la la la boom-dee-ayyy. Cue the elephants.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course not, but there's a big difference between putting 300 chips and 60-90 chips into the pot preflop when you're way out of position. I agree his range is probably wider than normal for UTG, but I really don't like the idea of putting 300 chips out with the distinct possibility I won't even see a flop. Situations vs. cards.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you fold AQ here?
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 04-17-2006, 05:08 PM
Melchiades Melchiades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Norway (London currently)
Posts: 5,040
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

I do.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 04-17-2006, 05:09 PM
ryanghall ryanghall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,789
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

Yup.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 04-17-2006, 05:17 PM
Eagles Eagles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Saving the season
Posts: 8,324
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

A few random thoughts
1. I truly thought the only hands RGH would call a shove with were AA and KK.
2. In RGH's position I think I am calling or reraising 99+ AK+ and an argument can be made for 88 and AQ depending on the table. Keep in mind it's pretty easy to get rid of the hands at the bottom of the range if someone comes in behind.
3. Outside of AK everyhand for RGH is a call or fold. If you reraise QQ+ you drive out worse hands and if you reraise JJ- you only get action from better hands. Me having JJ is one of the only scenarios where a call ends up being bad.
4. Does everyone agree that qq is a call if an unknown is pushing.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.