#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 9/27 NCAA Football
Yes, now we have 2 for and 2 against on this thread. "Heavy" on Oregon indeed.
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 9/27 NCAA Football
[ QUOTE ]
ND +21.5, 1u Troy -12.5/-105 1u USF +7/-105 I took ArkSt -4/-110 last night, also for 1 unit. USF +7.5/-110 1 more u Oregon -5.5/-105 1u lean UNC, ECU, Pitt +7 [/ QUOTE ] Pooooooooooooooosh! |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 9/27 NCAA Football
So I'm guessing Dr. Bob was on Toledo? I had an offer up for Toledo +1(-101) yesterday and when I went to see if it had been matched, I saw the line was at Toledo -1(-111). Two points plus ten cents is to kill the entire edge of the bet IMO.
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 9/27 NCAA Football
Yep, he was on Toledo and Houston and USF and Pitt, but I got better odds than him on USF!
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 9/27 NCAA Football
[ QUOTE ]
the heavy prevalence of oregon in these posts is peculiar. take cal. tlt [/ QUOTE ] Actually, its not that peculiar if you know anything about line movement. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 9/27 NCAA Football
Bob wasn't officially on USF, but he highly valued them. If he was officially on them I wouldn't have played USF as much as I did.
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 9/27 NCAA Football
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] the heavy prevalence of oregon in these posts is peculiar. take cal. tlt [/ QUOTE ] Actually, its not that peculiar if you know anything about line movement. [/ QUOTE ] I'd love for rush66 to do a FAQ on line movements I'd learn a ton |
|
|