#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2007-2008 NBA MVP
tuq,
No marquee wtf? Part of what makes Nash not MVP is that he doesn't play enough minutes and his scoring numbers are still inflated per/40 because of the fast paced offense. IrishHand, Player A has a 12 win team and makes them a 32 win team. Player B has a 40 win team and makes them a 50 win team. Who is better? |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2007-2008 NBA MVP
[ QUOTE ]
tuq, No marquee wtf? Part of what makes Nash not MVP is that he doesn't play enough minutes and his scoring numbers are still inflated per/40 because of the fast paced offense. IrishHand, Player A has a 12 win team and makes them a 32 win team. Player B has a 40 win team and makes them a 50 win team. Who is better? [/ QUOTE ] If the difference between 40 and 50 wins is the diff between not making playoffs and having a good chance to advance to 2nd round (well within the realm) then Player B. Also, it's easier to have an large incremental win impact on a terrible team than a mediocre team. (though I have no clue if large is 5 wins, or 10 or more.) |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2007-2008 NBA MVP
Clark,
I agree with your second point and was going to post that, but forgot. Let's rephrase it this way You are a GM of a random team you have to pick player A or B, who do you pick? |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2007-2008 NBA MVP
[ QUOTE ]
i really dont think you could swap anyone with lebron and the cavs would be better. i could be biased since i watch all the cavs games and rarely watch other teams so i do have homer persuasions to him. [/ QUOTE ] You're not biased, he's the best player in the league. I think swap him with Dhow, Dunc, or Nash, and the dropoff is relatively minute though. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2007-2008 NBA MVP
Bobbo,
I think Nash gets worse on any non-Phoenix team, Phoenix is such a perfect system for his skill set. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2007-2008 NBA MVP
[ QUOTE ]
Bobbo, I think Nash gets worse on any non-Phoenix team, Phoenix is such a perfect system for his skill set. [/ QUOTE ] thing is, any team he goes will create a system around him because he's that good |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2007-2008 NBA MVP
no, he's not. how can you create a system when you don't have amare / marion / dirk / howard / etc. etc.? you can't just magically pluck those players.
lol @ irish, are you smoking rocks? |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2007-2008 NBA MVP
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Nash and Duncan should be the top 2 on any MVP ballot until further notice [/ QUOTE ] kthx keep us updated. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] FWIW, I think that Kobe, LeBron, and KG are all of pretty similar value, but all behind Duncan [/ QUOTE ] What changed in the last 12 days? [/ QUOTE ] MVP != best player to have in the playoffs [/ QUOTE ] likewise MVP =/= most valuable to his team. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2007-2008 NBA MVP
Nash wasn't even that good in Dallas. Good, yes, but not as good as he is now,
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2007-2008 NBA MVP
[ QUOTE ]
Nash wasn't even that good in Dallas. Good, yes, but not as good as he is now, [/ QUOTE ] [censored] that nash is god |
|
|