Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Gambling > Sports Betting
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 09-03-2007, 12:39 AM
NajdorfDefense NajdorfDefense is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 8,227
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

[ QUOTE ]
Temple -2.5 1.1u to win 1 unit.
BG +17, 1u
Okla -10, 1u so far
OregSt -3, 1u so far
PSU -14, 1u
Oregon +7, all 1.1 to win 1u

[/ QUOTE ]

Rutgers -13, 1u.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 09-03-2007, 12:55 AM
bills217 bills217 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: taking DVaut\'s money
Posts: 3,294
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

They sure are dragging their feet on these totals...
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 09-03-2007, 12:00 PM
Ichabod1985 Ichabod1985 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 830
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

Rutgers -14.5 v Navy 1 Unit
W. Virginia -23.5 @ Marshall 1 Unit
Nebraska -7 @ Wake Forest 3 Units
Virginia -16.5 v Duke 1 Unit
Colorado St +14 v California 1 Unit
LSU -12.5 v Virginia Tech 1 Unit
Florida -26.5 v Troy 1 Unit
Memphis -4 @ Arkansas St 1 Unit
Missouri -6 @ Mississippi 1 Unit
Washington +3 v Boise St 1 Unit
Washington ML +130 v Boise St 1 Unit
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 09-03-2007, 03:04 PM
NajdorfDefense NajdorfDefense is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 8,227
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Temple -2.5 1.1u to win 1 unit.
BG +17, 1u
Okla -10, 1u so far
OregSt -3, 1u so far
PSU -14, 1u
Oregon +7, all 1.1 to win 1u

[/ QUOTE ]

Rutgers -13, 1u.

[/ QUOTE ]

BYU +7.5, 1u.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 09-03-2007, 03:44 PM
bills217 bills217 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: taking DVaut\'s money
Posts: 3,294
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

Wow, Bowling Green +18 now...guess I'll add.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 09-03-2007, 03:47 PM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

I have MSU -10 as the 'true' line...unreal
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 09-03-2007, 03:50 PM
Austiger Austiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,504
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

[ QUOTE ]
Wow, Bowling Green +18 now...guess I'll add.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 09-03-2007, 03:55 PM
Ichabod1985 Ichabod1985 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 830
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

[ QUOTE ]
Wow, Bowling Green +18 now...guess I'll add.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm holding out for +21 [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 09-03-2007, 04:31 PM
dankhank dankhank is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: stagnating
Posts: 2,420
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

only reason i can think of for y'all's lines being so different than the current market, is that dantonio is focusing on a better run offense this season, and it worked in week1, to the tune of 7.8 yards per carry.

a dominant running game would lead me to have much more faith in the spartans overall, especially compared to their wild inconsistency in seasons past.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 09-03-2007, 04:38 PM
Ichabod1985 Ichabod1985 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 830
Default Re: Week 2 NCAAF - project the opening lines

[ QUOTE ]
only reason i can think of for y'all's lines being so different than the current market, is that dantonio is focusing on a better run offense this season, and it worked in week1, to the tune of 7.8 yards per carry.

a dominant running game would lead me to have much more faith in the spartans overall, especially compared to their wild inconsistency in seasons past.

[/ QUOTE ]

A dominant running game definately makes them better but I think a large part of that 7.8 ypc is attributable to how bad UAB is rather than how good MSU is.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.