60k "Staking" dispute

[El Diablo]

Boosted,

would you give permission for someone at Full Tilt to release your transaction records during this period to prove that:

a) There was a GUY 2 who transferred you $10k and that you then transferred back $10k after Filth sent you $10k

and

b) After Filth sent you the $10k, but before he sent you the additional $20k, there was a GUY 3 who transferred you $15k.

This would be a very easy way to show that you're telling the truth about some of the major points you've claimed in this thread.

[bruce18lee]

Okay so you agree that a total of 60k was lost. But BoostedJ CLEARLY says that he sold off half his action in the 75-150. This has been brought up and confirmed by him many times. So if its true that he lost a total of 60k, then The.Filth only lost 30k in the game.

[bkholdem]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Thus, this thread has been reduced to entertainment value, so I for one would appreciate more KKF, FF, Bruiser, et al posts on such wide-ranging subjects as street cred, the level of cynicism in the online poker community, and contract killers from the animal kingdom gogogogoogogogo

[/ QUOTE ]
yes

[/ QUOTE ]

http://good-times.webshots.com/photo...97949293qEGEik

[aislephive]

It's clear that Boosted mislead Filth (intentially or not) when he said it was "100% nor risk." But come on guys, don't be so naive. They BOTH agreed to turn the deal into a stake in that AIM convo. ANYTIME that you stake somebody you are risking money. OP couldn't honestly believe that he could "stake" Boosted, get 50% of the profits, and not risk a dime in the process. I don't give a [censored] if Boosted said there was 100% no risk, a stake is a stake.

[aejones]

Anyone else think Boosted is kind of closer to busto than he wants us to believe?

[iRock]

Isn't the term "staking a winning player" contradictory? If they were a winning player consistently, they wouldn't need a stake...unless they went broke on bad bankroll management, which if thats the case do you really want to trust them with your money?

Also that [censored] about the gorilla and buffalo was funny.

[JMa]

[ QUOTE ]
Isn't the term "staking a winning player" contradictory? If they were a winning player consistently, they wouldn't need a stake...unless they went broke on bad bankroll management, which if thats the case do you really want to trust them with your money?


[/ QUOTE ]

boosted said he needed online monies..he had money offline but prob couldnt get it online

[EmpireMaker2]

[ QUOTE ]
It's clear that Boosted mislead Filth (intentially or not) when he said it was "100% nor risk." But come on guys, don't be so naive. They BOTH agreed to turn the deal into a stake in that AIM convo. ANYTIME that you stake somebody you are risking money. OP couldn't honestly believe that he could "stake" Boosted, get 50% of the profits, and not risk a dime in the process. I don't give a [censored] if Boosted said there was 100% no risk, a stake is a stake.

[/ QUOTE ]

Kinda funny the two biggest boosted [censored]-suckers have posted the most in this thread....Do you realize we dont want your opinon either?

[El Diablo]

ae,

"Anyone else think Boosted is kind of closer to busto than he wants us to believe?"

Nah, I doubt anybody has had any thoughts like that or that Boosted is ripping off people with multiple stakes/sales for the same game.

[iRock]

So then why wouldn't he ask for a loan online instead of a stake where he is expecting half of any profits he'd make?