|
|
#512
08-22-2006, 11:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MAFIA
[ QUOTE ]
Also, does anyone else agree that Books saying that he peeked the other seer is bad for us and good for the mafia? [/ QUOTE ] mememememememe 
|
|
#513
08-22-2006, 11:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MAFIA
[ QUOTE ]
Also, does anyone else agree that Books saying that he peeked the other seer is bad for us and good for the mafia? [/ QUOTE ] It sucks, but it's better than him clearing horn, and getting eaten last night if horn is mafia. Trust me, if horn is mafia (and I think he is), and wdc is not, there's about a 0% chance that wdc doesn't get eaten last night. And then we're pooched.
|
|
#515
08-22-2006, 11:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MAFIA
That last line should read:
Trust me, if horn is mafia (and I think he is), and wdc is not, and wdc doesn't retract his statement about horn there's about a 0% chance that wdc doesn't get eaten last night. And then we're pooched
|
|
#516
08-22-2006, 11:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MAFIA
OH, good points. First, I said blocked because I wasn't quoting my PM language exactly. I could quote the entire PM exchange with Fish, but I think that would be considered an angle shot unless I get the OK.
Second, as seer I am completely unpredictable. My goal is to come out with players that are alive four or five days from now. There is no one I would not peek, with the exception of a few players I read very well. I think a lot of seers waste their peeks on people who don't survive if they are villagers. I want to clear up the people who survive to the end without anyone knowing what they are. I welcome the Mafia's attempt to figure out who I would peek the first day.
|
|
#517
08-22-2006, 11:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MAFIA
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Also, does anyone else agree that Books saying that he peeked the other seer is bad for us and good for the mafia? [/ QUOTE ] It sucks, but it's better than him clearing horn, and getting eaten last night if horn is mafia. Trust me, if horn is mafia (and I think he is), and wdc is not, there's about a 0% chance that wdc doesn't get eaten last night. And then we're pooched. [/ QUOTE ] If Horn is mafia, and Books is seer, they STILL eat Books last night IMO...even after Books "changed his view".
|
|
#520
08-22-2006, 11:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: MAFIA
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Also, does anyone else agree that Books saying that he peeked the other seer is bad for us and good for the mafia? [/ QUOTE ] It sucks, but it's better than him clearing horn, and getting eaten last night if horn is mafia. Trust me, if horn is mafia (and I think he is), and wdc is not, there's about a 0% chance that wdc doesn't get eaten last night. And then we're pooched. [/ QUOTE ] If Horn is mafia, and Books is seer, they STILL eat Books last night IMO...even after Books "changed his view". [/ QUOTE ] But it's not as harmful in that situation. I think they took a shot at the other seer last night, fully expecting us to lynch wdc today. If I'm wrong, no biggy, since we've got wdc squarely lined up for a lynch whenever we have confirmation. Please see my big post about why lynching the seer here is worse than letting a mafia live, even if he's the consigliere.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
