#501
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
lol... I'm a chicken now... ok, AcesHigh
|
#502
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
hahahaha... and why do I have to take one of your two options exactly? p.s. it's a rhetorical question, don't bother answering it. [/ QUOTE ] Sicne youre obviously a high roller, (since you were willing to bet $500 earlier) then you dont believe your statement is even 50% to happen, therefor is was retarted. |
#503
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
bottom line is if we hit these 2 games we win
pitching has been as adequate as could be expected based on the injuries If you told me the Mets were giving up 4 runs tonight, i would have taken it. We should be scoring at least 5 per game with this offense. Even with game 4 we are hitting like .230 this series. and no situational hitting Franco should have pinch hit for green when the lefty came in. Green should not be facing lefties late in the game. This is why Milledge should have been on the postseason roster. David Wright finally has a big hit in the 8th. He has been pressing for sure. If Maine pitches decent, i think the Mets win game 6. As Bobo said, Carpenter is beatable on the road 7-4 with a 4.70 on the road this year compared to 8-4 with a 1.84 at busch. My prediction Mets 7 Cards 4 |
#504
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
P.S. Bobo is not AcesHigh. AcesHigh was Karpinski. Bobo and Karpinski played in many a POG game against each other
|
#505
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] hahahaha... and why do I have to take one of your two options exactly? p.s. it's a rhetorical question, don't bother answering it. [/ QUOTE ] Sicne youre obviously a high roller, (since you were willing to bet $500 earlier) then you dont believe your statement is even 50% to happen, therefor is was retarted. [/ QUOTE ] I think a coinflip has a 50% chance to come up heads, but I don't put $500 on it every day... Ah, forget it.... why do I bother? |
#506
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] hahahaha... and why do I have to take one of your two options exactly? p.s. it's a rhetorical question, don't bother answering it. [/ QUOTE ] Sicne youre obviously a high roller, (since you were willing to bet $500 earlier) then you dont believe your statement is even 50% to happen, therefor is was retarted. [/ QUOTE ] I think a coinflip has a 50% chance to come up heads, but I don't put $500 on it every day... Ah, forget it.... why do I bother? [/ QUOTE ] I love troll on troll violence. |
#507
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
durrr durrrr dur dur durrrr [/ QUOTE ] great post buddy. |
#508
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
You have averaged almost 28 posts per day for the past 6 months straight. Its hard to believe how much you have single handedly lowered the quality of 2+2.
|
#509
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
You have averaged almost 28 posts per day for the past 6 months straight. Its hard to believe how much you have single handedly lowered the quality of 2+2. [/ QUOTE ] I'm sorry making comments backed by statistics that are always correct bothers you so much. List of assonine statements I've made... 1)The Mets are better than the Cardinals (96 wins vs 83) 2)Carpenter isn't good on the Road (4.50 Road ERA) 3)The Cardinals are a a bad team (.516 wp% in the worst division in a far weaker leagure) 4)Suppan @ home is better than Carpenter on the Road (ERA in the 2's) 5)Oliver Perez didn't pitch well in Game 4 (gave up hits to ever other batter, gave up 5 runs, and couldnt even get through 6 with a huge lead) ...But since I say thing people wish weren't true, I'm a troll. |
|
|