***Official 2006 NLCS Cards v. Mets Thread*** - Page 50

BobOjedaFan · #**491** 10-18-2006, 12:16 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Carpenter pitches 7+ innings tomorrow and gives up less than 2 runs. Count it.

[/ QUOTE ]

So thats 1 run. Wanna bet $500 on it?

challenger84 · #**492** 10-18-2006, 12:18 AM

lol... so you have money to bet all the sudden, after not backing up any of your ridiculous statements earlier? nice try.

BobOjedaFan · #**493** 10-18-2006, 12:25 AM

[ QUOTE ]
lol... so you have money to bet all the sudden, after not backing up any of your ridiculous statements earlier? nice try.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because my statement wasnt ridiculous.

LOOK UP THE STATS SUPPANS HOME STATES ARE B ETETR THAN CARPENTER'S ROAD STATS. I would have won that bet most likelt too since Suppan allowed 0 runs. The statement you just made is absurd, I'm willing to bet an insane amount of money on it. Are you?

nolanfan34 · #**494** 10-18-2006, 12:29 AM

One more game. Go Cards!!!!!

Then please go 6 games in the WS [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

challenger84 · #**495** 10-18-2006, 12:31 AM

what makes you think I'm going to wager $500 against someone that didn't want to wager $50 because his bankroll was too low? I'm not stupid...

BobOjedaFan · #**496** 10-18-2006, 12:33 AM

[ QUOTE ]
what makes you think I'm going to wager $500 against someone that didn't want to wager $50 because his bankroll was too low? I'm not stupid...

[/ QUOTE ]

lol. OK I'll give you 2 options..

1)Admit your statement was retarted
2)Take this bet (I'll transer the money to a mod pre bet if you dont trust me)

BobOjedaFan · #**497** 10-18-2006, 12:35 AM

If you were willing to bet $500 earlier, then if you won't take this one obviously you don't believe in what you just said. Way to blow smoke.

challenger84 · #**498** 10-18-2006, 12:37 AM

hahahaha... and why do I have to take one of your two options exactly?

p.s. it's a rhetorical question, don't bother answering it.

challenger84 · #**499** 10-18-2006, 12:39 AM

[ QUOTE ]
If you were willing to bet $500 earlier, then if you won't take this one obviously you don't believe in what you just said. Way to blow smoke.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, I swear to god you must be related to AcesHigh, if you're not the same person. I'm not going to take the bet because the odds aren't ridiculously stacked in my favor like they were for all the idiotic propositions you made earlier. Give me some odds that put it back in my favor and I'll bet you whatever you want.

I'm not required to back my statements up with money, just like you weren't when you refused to bet me earlier. Do you see the hypocrisy here? (another rhetorical question)

BobOjedaFan · #**500** 10-18-2006, 12:41 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If you were willing to bet $500 earlier, then if you won't take this one obviously you don't believe in what you just said. Way to blow smoke.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, I swear to god you must be related to AcesHigh, if you're not the same person. I'm not going to take the bet because the odds aren't ridiculously stacked in my favor like they were for all the idiotic propositions you made earlier. Give me some odds that put it back in my favor and I'll bet you whatever you want.

I'm not required to back my statements up with money, just like you weren't when you refused to bet me earlier. Do you see the hypocrisy here? (another rhetorical question)

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I was a chicken, now you are one too. So we're even. BTW my statement wasnt ridiculous. Suppan gave up 0 earned runs, if you took that bet you would have lost.

Do 2 things...

1)Look up Suppans home stats
2)Look up Carpenters road stats

...then teall me the statement was ridiculous. The stats support me.