4 handed 100/200 blindwar hand - Page 5

tongni · #41 01-12-2006, 05:53 PM

[ QUOTE ]
You must find this game very boring though.

[/ QUOTE ]

I do, but the money's good.

poker1O1 · #42 01-12-2006, 07:17 PM

[ QUOTE ]
pretty easy bet/call i think.

[/ QUOTE ]

jgorham · #43 01-12-2006, 08:13 PM

As usual, good posts Eric. And for the record I bet/fold this river.

The Truth · #44 01-13-2006, 10:43 AM

I bet/ im torn between fold and call.

Probably bet/call simply due to lack of read.

blake

Wynton · #45 01-13-2006, 03:05 PM

These stakes are so far out of my league that I hardly ever even read this forum. But I really think this is bet/call.

As some have said, don't we expect a decent player to raise a flush draw earlier? I think villain may have made a pair on the flop. But I also think that the combination of the flush possibility and the Ace would tempt many to bluff. Certainly, I believe there's enough chance of a bluff there to make folding to a raise bad.

Xellos · #46 01-14-2006, 04:23 AM

I've never played higher than 8/16, but I'll respond anyway.

I'm guessing most people here would bet-call, which is probably the simplest solution. Due to the aggro nature of these games and because he didn't 3 bet preflop I think we can probably take him off an ace. The fact he didn't raise the flop is also somewhat confusing. I feel like he may have paired and wanted to raise you on the turn, but then the Ace came off and he just got scared and is going into showdown mode. I'd think he'd raise a flush draw/straight draw on the flop often so I doubt he hit 1 pair on the river.

A case could be made for check-call since flush draw and some likely 2 pair hands made it, plus he will probably bet worse pairs/nothing, but I still think bet-call has more value.