TPTK 3 bet pot ~200 bb deep

[john voight]

wow. that is a sick read ICM
I guess i overestimated the 3b range by villain.

and also the postflop retardedness [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[AZplaya]

[ QUOTE ]
wow. that is a sick read ICM

[/ QUOTE ]
I have the same read so I'd say its probably pretty accurate.

[Profish2285]

You guys really think this is spew against an "unknown" with those stats though? I really dont think many 16/13's are showing up with anything other than AA, AQ, AK, or a lower pocket pair. Seeing as how I dominate that range how can a call be bad on this turn?

[john voight]

well I played maybe 100 or 150k hands of NL30(deep), and i'd say in my experience AK wouldn't be taking the pot down here usually. But I am strictly talking NL30.

Now, taht may be due to the fact that there isnt alot of 3 betting, so ppl show up w/ random [censored]. I guess w/ the heavy 3 betting from TAGs at NL50 you can narrow down the range. Where as when somoen cold calls, they may have anything. So maybe i overlooked that aspect.

I am currently transitioning form deepstakc tables to short tables, b/c I have been on tilt. So I am not used to the action at NL50.

[ICMoney]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
wow. that is a sick read ICM

[/ QUOTE ]
I have the same read so I'd say its probably pretty accurate.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey AZ:

[Profish2285]

Oh yea I can say that NL50 is definitely fairly aggro and with that of course there is a decent amount of 3 betting.