|
|
#41
10-10-2007, 06:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Before I quit let me teach you how poker works
HAHAHAHAHAHA
[ QUOTE ] See once you get to a certain point you have to "run good" or there is no chance you win at poker because of the fish. I haven't been able to win because I play with a ton of fish and I cannot make the best hand over a fish. See, because as this lecture states and is the main point of poker and I'll put it in bold The fish will never fold the best hand [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#43
10-10-2007, 06:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Before I quit let me teach you how poker works
[ QUOTE ]
Seriously FGators make a vid and give tuff_fish some competition for funniest [censored] ever in a poker video. [/ QUOTE ] I keep hearing about tuff_fish video - link plz?
|
|
#44
10-10-2007, 06:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: shotgun
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] fgators should just post a pokerev graph for his last 200k hands. That would solve everything. [/ QUOTE ] No it wouldn't. [/ QUOTE ] So posting the all-in graph wouldn't show whether he's truly running bad or not? [/ QUOTE ] Not neccessarily because how do you differentiate between coolers and bad play? He could have a tonne of set under sets, flush under flush, KKvAA etc and yet it would look like he is running normal. It would give us a fairly good idea I guess though [/ QUOTE ] No, the all-in graph just calculates his actual EV when all the money went in and compares it to what it theoretically should be. So say he goes AI as an 80% favourite 10 times for a $400 pot. He should have made $1600. Well it will calculate what he actually made and make a graph based on that.
|
|
#45
10-10-2007, 06:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Before I quit let me teach you how poker works
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] leet [/ QUOTE ] jesus [censored] christ could you not write it like that plz [/ QUOTE ] 1337 [-]4><><0|?$ #49907$ ! !$ #9@+0|?$ {*0|<3|? 83 |?*993|) |)|_|(`/????
|
|
#47
10-10-2007, 06:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: shotgun
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] fgators should just post a pokerev graph for his last 200k hands. That would solve everything. [/ QUOTE ] No it wouldn't. [/ QUOTE ] So posting the all-in graph wouldn't show whether he's truly running bad or not? [/ QUOTE ] Not neccessarily because how do you differentiate between coolers and bad play? He could have a tonne of set under sets, flush under flush, KKvAA etc and yet it would look like he is running normal. It would give us a fairly good idea I guess though [/ QUOTE ] No, the all-in graph just calculates his actual EV when all the money went in and compares it to what it theoretically should be. So say he goes AI as an 80% favourite 10 times for a $400 pot. He should have made $1600. Well it will calculate what he actually made and make a graph based on that. [/ QUOTE ] Yes I know that. But that graph could show him running well/as expected, but he could still be running horribly in the grand scheme of things because of gross coolers ete which will make all 3 lines plummet.
|
|
#50
10-10-2007, 06:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: shotgun
There's no point in discussing strat w/ FGators, he's too hardheaded, he just can't be taught. Most rational players would have realized it was them and make changes to fix leaks, or just quit outright a long time ago.
No instead he'll argue it to death, and then forge hand histories to convinced people he's running bad.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
