Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 09-18-2007, 03:32 AM
Perestroika Perestroika is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 248
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)

These players don't even know the odds of an open ended straight draw. Everyone was sitting around scratching their heads counting 1, 2, 3, 4 aces 4 sixes thats uh uh uh. Though its a great show I just can't believe how bad all these players are. I wonder if these players know that they aren't tricky and that they should just shut their mouths. Gold spews tells.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 09-18-2007, 03:36 AM
txbarbarossa txbarbarossa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Austin,TX
Posts: 154
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)

[ QUOTE ]
I'd say the difference between Farha and the guy at your table is that Farha is a really good reader.

Everyone remembers him getting lucky in HSP 1, what they seem to be forgetting are all the amazing bluffs he made when his opponents bet into him and weren't strong. He won a bunch of $15k pots that way.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think what happened in season 1 was the he used his "running hot" image well. He was winning hands when he showed and was able to pull off some bluffs b/c of it.

I still can't figure out how Lindgren folded TPTK (AJ) on a fairly dry board in season 3. Turns out farha had a strong draw flush plus overcard but Lindgren needs to stick it in there against a steamer. Pretty bad fold. Scared money it seemed. If he has TPTK beat, so be it. Some guys you gotta be willing to go all the way with that hand, others you can muck TPTK without thinking too hard.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 09-18-2007, 04:41 AM
Veil Veil is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 43
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)

[ QUOTE ]
These players don't even know the odds of an open ended straight draw.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course they know, although it's different against a set, due to the board pairing on either street, making the calculation pretty damned difficult to do in your head and I'm a mathematician. Yes, you're around a 3-to-1 favorite with a set against an OESD, but there's so many things these guys have to remember that this is pretty useless in the grand scheme of things to know the exact odds here.

[ QUOTE ]
Gold spews tells.

[/ QUOTE ]

Anyone who thinks this is an absolute and utter moron, period. Even Gold admits to making random actions and speeches which not even he knows about. Bloody hell, I'm so sick of this this ignorant Gold hate I feel like getting hit by a bus sometimes.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 09-18-2007, 05:00 AM
-moe- -moe- is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 64
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)

[ QUOTE ]
These players don't even know the odds of an open ended straight draw.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I'd be surprised if they didn't, but Hellmuth's draw to a full house (7 outs for that on the turn, 10 on the river) complicates the calculation, as you can't simply just count the OESD-outs and use "the rule of 4".

Anyone have a simple rule of thumb for calculating the percentages in that case? Or is it something one just memorizes?

(I'm talking about OESD vs assumed set, vs assumed trips, vs assumed two pair, and ditto for flush-draw vs set / trips / two pair.)
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 09-18-2007, 05:56 AM
Janis N. Janis N. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 527
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)

Very bad poker this week. I cannot recall one hand that was played even remotely alright by everyone involved.

Any winning SSNL player would be massively EV+ in that game.

Sad to see Baxter donk off money to Hellmuth; sad to see Safai who's the biggest ATM at the table hand his money to Gold, etc.

[ QUOTE ]
and btw, boo for high stakes not inviting townsend back. Who wants to see that nit Harman play. Get townsend back in there. Ivey too .. and bring back Brad Busto Booth. I want to see him raise bluff allin $300K with someone else's money

[/ QUOTE ]qft
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 09-18-2007, 06:55 AM
thac thac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Go Buckeyes imo
Posts: 9,941
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)

Seriously, did Harman play a hand all episode? She's [censored] ridiculous.

Hellmuth sucks with his insurance talk taking up 3 minutes of time.

I really hate this episode even though I liked Negreanu's plays as said before (switching cards was pretty funny).

Can't wait til Jman gets on here, which I assume is in 2 episodes?
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 09-18-2007, 07:02 AM
bazooka87 bazooka87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 596
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)

Nah Harman didn't play one
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 09-18-2007, 07:22 AM
Daddy Warbucks Daddy Warbucks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Doin\' numbers like Soduku
Posts: 3,968
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)

I love how everybody is waiting for Jman, but he said before that he nitted it up so bad that even Hellmuth commented on it....
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 09-18-2007, 07:26 AM
eMbAh eMbAh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 430
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)

Whats up with the Jamie Gold hate?
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 09-18-2007, 08:24 AM
charliecozz charliecozz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 86
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/17)

[ QUOTE ]
Whats up with the Jamie Gold hate?

[/ QUOTE ]
I find him arrogant, BAD, and thinks himself very clever when he's just plain annoying. Unfortunately he got great cards last night and won some money. hate to see it.

[ QUOTE ]
it is amazing how much the rest of the table openly disrespects jamie.

do you think he realizes this, or is he just so much in his own world that he doesn't pick up on all the snickering everytime he does something so stupid?

[/ QUOTE ]No-I think he things they're laughing with him not AT him.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.