NCAAF Team totals plays

[pirateboy]

WTF man? You said Cal wasn't a toss-up and provided nothing to back it up except "Check the other thread." I thought the idea of this forum was to discuss openly our ideas and bets. Not be a condescending douchebag.

[pirateboy]

I do, by the way, back up my assertions with wagers. Just not with people on a forum.

I loved this forum last year and was looking forward to today. You've turned it into [censored].

[Thremp]

[ QUOTE ]
I do, by the way, back up my assertions with wagers. Just not with people on a forum.

I loved this forum last year and was looking forward to today. You've turned it into [censored].

[/ QUOTE ]

No, you are just clearly making an error. You made an incorrect assertion that you are unwilling to stand by. You made a range of losses where Cal should be a dog and then you won't accept. You aren't even going to make this wager anywhere else, you just want to be an Arizona State homer and provide baseless analysis.

You've said something along the lines of "Arizona State was best in 2006 statwise"

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/confsortab...&lite=false

What stats are you talking about?

[pirateboy]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I do, by the way, back up my assertions with wagers. Just not with people on a forum.

I loved this forum last year and was looking forward to today. You've turned it into [censored].

[/ QUOTE ]

No, you are just clearly making an error. You made an incorrect assertion that you are unwilling to stand by. You made a range of losses where Cal should be a dog and then you won't accept. You aren't even going to make this wager anywhere else, you just want to be an Arizona State homer and provide baseless analysis.

You've said something along the lines of "Arizona State was best in 2006 statwise"

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/confsortab...&lite=false

What stats are you talking about?

[/ QUOTE ]

I said they were 3rd in the Pac 10 statistically. And yes, I did make a wager on Arizona State O7.5 Wins at Bookmaker.

Seriously, when you disagree with someone, you give them this much [censored]?

[pirateboy]

http://cfbauthority.blogspot.com/200...wn-pac-10.html

Of course, you'll [censored] on this, too.

[pirateboy]

http://cfbauthority.blogspot.com/200...of-pac-10.html

And, you'll poo all over that. But to accuse me of doing no homework is ridiculous.

[Thremp]

Usually.

I don't see what stats they are 3rd in. Or a comprehensive overall score. I see them as middle of the pack in most offensive categories.

http://web1.ncaa.org/d1mfb/natlRank.jsp?div=4

Here they are middle of the pack in almost all defensive categories.

My main problems are:
1) You aren't being truthful in your statements.
2) You provide little basis for analysis.
3) When I offer you a "fair" price for a wager you commented on above with your direct quote about the losses each team will face, you declined and immediately quoted what I would consider to be a fair line instead of what you actually wrote.

[pirateboy]

I am being truthful in my statements. I can seriously handle you disagreeing with me; in fact, it's fun! I love the discussion, it only makes us better at this.

But what I'm hacked off about is your general dickface attitude from the front. I feel like I was at least an average poster here last year, so I didn't anticipate bad attitudes.

[Thremp]

[ QUOTE ]
I am being truthful in my statements. I can seriously handle you disagreeing with me; in fact, it's fun! I love the discussion, it only makes us better at this.

But what I'm hacked off about is your general dickface attitude from the front. I feel like I was at least an average poster here last year, so I didn't anticipate bad attitudes.

[/ QUOTE ]

Okay, then show how Arizona St. is 3rd statwise last year. And under what logical system Cal should be a dog to Arizona St in season wins or retract that ridiculous statement about their losses.

[pirateboy]

I linked it earlier.

Would you say it's true that systems don't work in sports betting?